Quantcast

 

U.S. District Court, Maryland (access required)

Posted: 1:00 am Sun, October 20, 2002
By admin

AntitrustViolations of the Sherman ActBOTTOM LINE: Aircraft refueler’s claim against airport, county board, airport advisory commission, airport manager, and a competing refueler, that restriction on its ability to refuel was anti-competitive, in restraint of trade, and created a monopoly on refueling at the airport, failed because it failed to meet the minimum standards required of ...

Comments

Comments are closed.