Quantcast

 

Legal Opinions – U.S. v. Hall; U.S. v. Handy, US4th Nos. 07-4067, 07-4070, 07-4397, & 07-4398 (access required)

Posted: 1:00 am Mon, January 26, 2009
By admin

Criminal ProcedureDouble JeopardyBOTTOM LINE: In successive prosecution of criminal defendant in multiple jurisdictions, Double Jeopardy Clause did not bar his Maryland convictions where his prior District of Columbia convictions related to different conduct.CASE: U.S. v. Hall; U.S. v. Handy, US4th Nos. 07-4067, 07-4070, 07-4397, & 07-4398 (filed Jan. 8, 2009) (Judges KING, Shedd & Agee). ...

Comments

Comments are closed.