Legal opinions – U.S. District Court, Maryland  

Posted: 7:44 pm Mon, January 18, 2010
By Daily Record Staff

Civil Procedure Interpleader BOTTOM LINE: Although interpleader did not seek actual payment of funds from disputed annuity, its stated interest in seeing that the funds were properly paid under its underlying distribution terms was sufficient to defeat plaintiff’s assertion that plaintiff was the only remaining claimant. CASE:  Rapid Settlements, Ltd. v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Civil ...