Shore leaders: Environment dept. ‘inflexible’
Posted: 5:52 pm Mon, February 15, 2010
By marylandreporter.com
Lawmakers from the Eastern Shore have clashed with the Secretary of the Environment, calling her agency “inflexible” and a hindrance to job growth in farming and other industries in their area.
At a joint Eastern Shore delegation meeting with environment Secretary Shari Wilson and agriculture Secretary Buddy Hance Friday, the senators and delegates said environmental regulations on chicken houses, stormwater and septic systems are slowing down or halting projects in their counties.
Sen. Lowell Stoltzfus, a Lower Shore Republican, said investors wanted to build 30 chicken houses on the Eastern Shore, but the department didn’t let them.
“The people that wanted to work hard to raise food for our country were stopped and they’ve lost spirit and they’re no longer requesting funding to build chicken houses,” Stoltzfus said with frustration.
Stoltzfus said the Department of Agriculture is dominated by the Department of the Environment on rules about disposing of animal waste and dead livestock.
Raising chickens and processing them for sale is a billion-dollar business on the Shore.
Listing the department’s priorities as public health, water quality and healthy air, Wilson said the agency will try to be flexible with regulations, but the delegation seemed skeptical.
Del. Norman Conway, a Salisbury Democrat who chairs the House Appropriations Committee, said he’s frustrated that regulations are holding up agricultural projects.
“I hope the country does not get hungry to understand the significance of agriculture,” said Conway.
At the suggestion of Del. Jim Mathias, a Democrat, the delegation plans to write a letter to Gov. Martin O’Malley and try to meet with him, emphasizing the importance of agriculture on the Eastern Shore. Mathias said O’Malley had helped on similar issues in the past.
Republican Sen. Richard Colburn from Cambridge said he believes “river keepers,” environmentalists who watch over particular waterways, are dictating business on the Eastern Shore. He compared them to watermelons: “green on the outside and red or socialist on the inside.”
Colburn said petitioning by the river keepers has slowed important projects, like putting a geothermal energy system in a high school.
“These river keepers can’t bring Maryland to a standstill and that’s what they’re doing,” said Colburn.
Wilson said she receives complaints and lawsuits from both sides, and said the petitions to the department don’t bring anything to a halt.
Del. Jeannie Haddaway-Riccio, an Easton Republican, said if that’s true, there’s a communication problem in the department.
Haddaway said every time she calls on behalf of a constituent who tries to get a permit, like one for shoreline protection, “the answer always comes back that ‘We have to evaluate all these other factors because we have all these accusations and all these pressures from the water keepers.’”
Wilson said a required public comment session can slow the process, but lawmakers countered that some projects had already received permits and yet been forced to undergo additional hearings.
Expressing concerns heard from all over Maryland, the Eastern Shore legislators raised questions about new stormwater regulations and what project approvals could be grandfathered under older regulations. The delegation wanted to see better defined rules of what can be built under old regulations.
Wilson said the department will soon issue “guidance” to local jurisdictions on how to implement the new rules.
She said delaying implementation of the new regulations, as some developers and legislators have proposed, only pushes the problem of dealing with stormwater pollution to a later date.
While she said she’ll try to be flexible, it is the department’s role to “implement rules the best way we can. We have to move forward the best we can.”
MarylandReporter.com is a nonprofit news Web site covering state government and politics.

![[Print]](http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/dmc_sociable_toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/dmc_sociable_toolbar/email_2.png)
![[RSS Feed]](http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/dmc_sociable_toolbar/rssfeed.png)
Dolan Business Books
Lawyers Weekly Books
Comments
How much of this problem relates to farming practices that pollute the Bay? Instead of suspending environmental protection laws, the State could subsidize conversion of those farming operations to organic farms. Markets for organic products are growing exponentially, and state subsidies could support the farms during the conversion process. Employment should also improve to the extent that organic farming requires more manual labor. Yes, it costs $. The economy is sick, but it will get better. The Bay won’t.
I agree with Denise. The issue has to be approached in a far-sighted way. We all need to convert to more sustainable ways of doing things, and, if necessary to more belt-tightening. Our health has to take priority. The time to safeguard water is now, not when more damage has been done.
There is no doubt that locally grown foods and organic foods are an important part of our diet and in demand by consumers. That said, there is a place for all types of agriculture and yes, all of them are capable of doing it in an environmentally friendly way. If we are to return to what some people consider “sustainable” we will need to reduce the world’s population by 2/3. I have outdoor skills and food production skills but I am afraid that there are many who do not.
POST A COMMENT