Quantcast

 

Editorial: Gansler opinion should stand

Posted: 7:32 pm Thu, February 25, 2010
By Daily Record Staff

Impeach Doug Gansler? Not hardly.

The attorney general issued his long-awaited opinion Wednesday, saying that same-sex marriages performed legally outside of Maryland should be recognized here although Maryland law does not allow such marriages to be performed here.

The opinion does not have the force of law, but it does have the effect of notifying state agencies that they should extend to these same-sex couples the same rights and benefits afforded to married heterosexual couples. Gov. Martin O’Malley has asked all state agencies to comply.

The opinion generated outrage and bombast in some quarters, including a call from Del. Don Dwyer Jr., R-Anne Arundel, that Mr. Gansler be impeached “for usurping the authority of the General Assembly.”

Whether you agree with Mr. Gansler’s opinion — and we do — or not, there is not a scintilla of evidence to support Mr. Dwyer’s position. The attorney general was simply doing his job, interpreting the law. We believe he did it well.

The 45-page opinion explained that under the U.S. Constitution, states are required to recognize legally binding agreements, including marriage contracts, issued by other states.

The only exception to this rule occurs when a contract so deeply offends a state’s public policy that the state cannot extend such recognition. Mr. Gansler concluded that Maryland’s recognizing same-sex marriages legally performed elsewhere does not meet that test.

The attorney general noted that in recent years, Maryland has extended numerous rights short of marriage — such as the right to adopt and the right of partners to be involved in medical decisions involving their loved ones — to same-sex couples. He also cited the Court of Appeals’ history of recognizing marriages from other states, including common-law marriages, that are not allowed in Maryland.

In all likelihood, the Court of Appeals will get the chance to decide this issue. But until then, the attorney general’s opinion is reasonable, sound and fair, and it should stand.

Comments

  • Thomas Paine says:

    I was actually going to subscribe to the Daily Record, but you just had to put the “we do” when talking about agreeing with the AG’s opinion. I dislike the ABA because of the various political stances they take (such as pro-choice and anti-gun). The Daily Record just lost my future business for the same reason. Good business model, I hope expousing your views works well for you in this tough economy.

    Posted on 02/26/10 at 11:13 pm
  • John Gabel says:

    I thought editorials were for expression opinions.

    From dictionary.com

    ed•i•to•ri•al   /ˌɛdɪˈtɔriəl, -ˈtoʊr-/ Show Spelled[ed-i-tawr-ee-uhl, -tohr-] Show IPA
    –noun
    1.an article in a newspaper or other periodical presenting the opinion of the publisher, editor, or editors.

    Given the long tradition of news media publishing editorials, I find Mr. Paine’s take on this surprising. Perhaps Mr. Paine could express a different way of saying that the authors agree with the AG’s opinion that is more efficient than just saying they agree with it in those two words?

    Posted on 02/28/10 at 11:25 am
  • Jon Connery says:

    Has anybody read the full faith and credit clause of the U S Constitution?? The AG’s opinion complies faithfully and rightfully so !! Where are the Attorneys General of the other states living—- with their heads up their butts ??? Maybe before they are elected or appointed , they should be required to familiarize themselves with the U S Constitution.. I am amazed at the lack of enforcement of this very important State’s rights mandate — only in regard to same sex marriages performed in other states….. LEGALLY… There seems to be no problem like this for heterosexuals marrying in other states gaining recognition?? Another point of inequality, lack of fairness and discrimination ….. Liberty and Justice for ALL ??????

    Posted on 03/01/10 at 1:52 pm

POST A COMMENT