Quantcast

 

Baltimore’s FiOS chances getting slimmer

Posted: 5:23 pm Fri, March 26, 2010
By Staff and Wire Reports

If Verizon Communications Inc. hasn’t already started wiring your city or town with its FiOS fiber-optic TV and broadband service, chances are you won’t get it.

Where it’s available, FiOS usually provides the only competition for cable TV apart from satellite service. Studies have shown that its entry into an area leads to lower cable prices, though FiOS itself has not been undercutting cable TV prices substantially.

But Verizon is nearing the end of its program to replace copper phone lines with optical fibers that provide much higher Internet speeds and TV service. Its focus is now on completing the network in the communities where it has already secured “franchises,” the rights to sell TV service that rivals cable, said spokeswoman Heather Wilner.

That means Verizon will continue to pull fiber to homes in Washington, D.C., New York City and Philadelphia — projects that will take years to complete — but will leave such major cities as Baltimore and downtown Boston without FiOS.

A coalition of civic organizations, churches and labor groups rallied outside Verizon Maryland’s headquarters in downtown Baltimore on March 16 to express frustration that Verizon is ignoring the city. The group launched a bus billboard campaign with ads that read: “This bus isn’t the only thing passing you by. Verizon’s bringing high speed Internet everywhere but Baltimore.”

Verizon is rolling out FiOS service in Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Harford, Howard, Montgomery and Prince George’s counties.

Verizon is still negotiating for franchises in some smaller communities, mainly in New York, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, but it is not working on securing franchises for any major urban areas, Wilner said. It has, for example, halted negotiations for Alexandria, Va.

Verizon never committed to bringing FiOS to its entire local-phone service area. It has introduced FiOS in 16 states, but the deployment is concentrated on the East Coast, and Verizon is selling off most of its service areas in the Midwest and on the West Coast. Its stated goal was to make FiOS available to 18 million households by the end of 2010, and it’s on track to reach or exceed that.

That will still leave a third of its service area (excluding the territories it is selling) without fiber. And as Verizon has signaled this month that it’s focusing on communities where it already has franchises, it’s now becoming clear which ones are in and which are out.

The New York-based company hinted in 2008 that it might continue expansion of FiOS beyond this year, but the recession seems to have crimped that possibility. The company has pulled back on promotions for new subscribers, like the 19-inch TVs it gave away under one campaign. That in turn has led to lower recruitment figures.

CEO Ivan Seidenberg told investors in January that FiOS itself has been doing well, but Verizon’s sales of services to large businesses have suffered in the downturn, and it needed to offset that by not being too “aggressive” in marketing FiOS.

Verizon doesn’t appear to have ruled out further FiOS expansion, but doesn’t have any plans, either. The economics are apparently not attractive enough: TV service carries fairly low margins compared to Verizon’s telephone business, according to analyst Craig Moffett at Sanford Bernstein.

Moffett believes the end of FiOS expansion means that cable companies will lose fewer subscribers, starting next year.

The recruitment of new FiOS TV subscribers slowed last year. In the fourth quarter, it added 153,000 subscribers, little more than half of the number it added in the same period the year before.

At the end of last year, Verizon had 2.86 million FiOS TV subscribers and 3.43 million FiOS Internet subscribers (most households take both).

Verizon has faced skepticism from investors over the project because of the high costs. Wiring a neighborhood for FiOS costs Verizon about $750 per home. Actually connecting a home to the network costs another $600. The total cost from 2004 to 2010 was budgeted at $23 billion.

But FiOS has allowed Verizon to mount an effective resistance to cable companies, which are siphoning off landline phone customers and can offer higher broadband speeds than phone companies without fiber straight to homes can.

Verizon is the only major U.S. phone company to draw fiber all the way to homes and the only one to offer broadband speeds approaching those available in Japan and South Korea. The halt to further expansion comes as the Federal Communications Commission has sent Congress the country’s first “national broadband plan,” aimed at making Internet access faster, more affordable and more widely available.

AT&T Inc. and Qwest Communications International Inc. are laying fiber into neighborhoods, but still use copper phone lines to take the signal the last stretch of the way, into homes. That’s a less costly strategy that has drawn less scrutiny from Wall Street, but it also limits top broadband speeds. Meanwhile, cable companies are upgrading modems this year to offer higher speeds, a relatively inexpensive move.

Comments

  • Judith says:

    We are one of the lucky ones who got FIOS in Baltimore County. It has been a fantastic increase in service and reliability. I wouldn’t switch back if you gave me a 19 inch TV to do it.

    The economy is hurting everyone very badly, and cable/Internet industry is no exception. But, I believe fiber optic is here to stay. The experiment worked and will be ready for when the recovery begins.

    And, no, I don’t work for Verizon, FIOs or any other telecommunications company.

    Posted on 03/27/10 at 4:53 am
  • Robb says:

    I have Verizon as my phone and internet carrier. I have been waiting diligently for over 4 years (since introduced to us in the city) because of whatever reasons, Verizon has decided to delay or deny FIOS service into Baltimore and because of this I have decided that as soon as my contract ends with Verizon I am going to go to COMCAST since I have missed so very many deals and only 2 blocks away from my house it can be installed (which has me very angry). I can understand that it is rather costly to offer this to the entire city but if Verizon is not coming to Baltimore then they need to stop advertising a product that cannot be purchased. It is extremely disheartening that I have to be forced to either move or deal with an inferior product.

    My final statement VERIZON YOU SUCK!

    Posted on 04/28/10 at 4:38 pm

POST A COMMENT