Opinions – 2/6/12: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
6:00 pm Sun, February 5, 2012
Posted: 6:00 pm Sun, February 5, 2012
By Daily Record Staff
BOTTOM LINE: The U.S. District Court did not err in finding that the government failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that defendant was “a sexually dangerous person,”; the court reasonably found one expert’s opinion to be more credible than the others offered as to whether defendant would have serious difficulty in ...
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here.