Opinions – 2/6/12: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Administrative Law Civil commitment BOTTOM LINE: The U.S. District Court did not err in finding that the government failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that defendant was “a sexually dangerous person,”; the court reasonably found one expert’s opinion to be more credible than the others offered as to whether defendant would have serious difficulty in ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *