Law digest: 4/23/12 
Posted: 6:00 pm Sun, April 22, 2012
By
Login required
You have clicked on a link to information that is exclusive to The Daily Record subscribers. | ||
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here. |
||
Interested in Subscribing?
Start by choosing how you'd like your news delivered.
- Print and Digital - | 
|
- Maryland Family Law - |
![[Print]](http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/print.png)
![[Email]](http://api.addthis.com/oexchange/0.8/forward/email/offer?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2012/04/22/law-digest-42312/&title=Law digest: 4/23/12 <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>)
![[RSS Feed]](http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/rssfeed.png)
![[Facebook]](http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-sociable-toolbar/facebook.png)
![[linkedin]](http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2012/04/22/law-digest-42312/&title=Law digest: 4/23/12 <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&summary=MARYLAND+COURT+OF+APPEALS%0AFamily+Law%2C+Uniform+Child+Custody+Jurisdiction+and+Enforcement+Act%3A+Guardianship+decree+issued+in+Japan+did+not+sever+father%E2%80%99s+custodial+rights+to+his+daughter%2C+and+therefore+did+not+implicate+fundamental+principles+of+human+rights%3B+as+such%2C+%E2%80%9Cvacuum+exception%E2%80%9D+to+application+of+Uniform+Child+Custody+Jurisdiction+and+Enforcement+Act%2C+allowing+for+a+Maryland+circuit+%5B...%5D&source=Maryland+Daily+Record)
![[Twitter]](http://twitter.com/home/?status=Law digest: 4/23/12 <span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>+http://thedailyrecord.com/2012/04/22/law-digest-42312/)
Comments