<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court agrees to review Maryland DNA ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedailyrecord.com/2012/11/09/supreme-court-agrees-to-review-maryland-dna-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2012/11/09/supreme-court-agrees-to-review-maryland-dna-ruling/</link>
	<description>Maryland&#039;s trusted source for business and legal news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 10:26:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Walsh</title>
		<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2012/11/09/supreme-court-agrees-to-review-maryland-dna-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-58420</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyrecord.com/?p=227728#comment-58420</guid>
		<description>We want to emphasize that what Maryland Attorney General Gansler is trying to do is to bank DNA on people only suspected of, not only convicted of a crime.  That is what makes this so unconstitutional and really questions how Gansler was elected as a Democrat.  We are in a hyper-securitized society for the time being; a result of the hold that global/defense hawk pols have on our government at the Federal and State level.  Gansler&#039;s stance shows that Maryland leads in this hawkish stance that suspends civil liberties for all.

One can imagine a scenario of police wanting to see a person who is innocent become a member of this DNA database and simply having to arrest that person under suspicion only to have that person released.  Unfortunately this isn&#039;t far-fetched, it is already happening.  So citizens in Maryland will cross our collective fingers that higher courts will offer a reasoned ruling and we will need to start work on replacing incumbents in Maryland who did not shout out against this action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We want to emphasize that what Maryland Attorney General Gansler is trying to do is to bank DNA on people only suspected of, not only convicted of a crime.  That is what makes this so unconstitutional and really questions how Gansler was elected as a Democrat.  We are in a hyper-securitized society for the time being; a result of the hold that global/defense hawk pols have on our government at the Federal and State level.  Gansler&#8217;s stance shows that Maryland leads in this hawkish stance that suspends civil liberties for all.</p>
<p>One can imagine a scenario of police wanting to see a person who is innocent become a member of this DNA database and simply having to arrest that person under suspicion only to have that person released.  Unfortunately this isn&#8217;t far-fetched, it is already happening.  So citizens in Maryland will cross our collective fingers that higher courts will offer a reasoned ruling and we will need to start work on replacing incumbents in Maryland who did not shout out against this action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
