Posted: 3:00 pm Sun, December 23, 2012
By Daily Record Staff
BOTTOM LINE: Evidence of post-breach market conditions not contemplated by the parties in the contract is inadmissible to prove lost profits and, therefore, the trial court properly excluded such evidence proffered by defendants.
CASE: CR-RSC Tower, LLC v. RSC Tower I, LLC, No. 115, September Term, 2011 (filed Nov. 27, 2012) (Judges Bell, Greene, ADKINS, ...
Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here.