Quantcast

Opinions – 12/24/12: Maryland Court of Appeals

Contract Law Damages BOTTOM LINE: Evidence of post-breach market conditions not contemplated by the parties in the contract is inadmissible to prove lost profits and, therefore, the trial court properly excluded such evidence proffered by defendants. CASE: CR-RSC Tower, LLC v. RSC Tower I, LLC, No. 115, September Term, 2011 (filed Nov. 27, 2012) (Judges Bell, Greene, ADKINS, ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

 

[index]
[index]
[i]
[i]
[id, count]
[id, count]
[f.tagName.toLowerCase()]
[f.tagName.toLowerCase()]
[id, validationType, arg1, arg2]
[id, validationType, arg1, arg2]
[field.tagName.toLowerCase()]
[field.tagName.toLowerCase()]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]
[i]