Opinions – 2/6/14: Maryland Court of Appeals

Criminal Law Theft by deception  BOTTOM LINE: Evidence was sufficient to support conviction for theft, where defendant obtained possession of home through deception and occupied home for period of time without payment to lawful owner; consolidated theft statute did not require asportation of property or proof of actual deprivation. CASE: Hobby v. State, No. 33, Sept. Term, 2013 ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Scroll To Top