<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Maryland Daily Record &#187; Opinions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedailyrecord.com/category/law/opinions-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedailyrecord.com</link>
	<description>Maryland&#039;s trusted source for business and legal news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:10:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Law digest &#8211; 5/16/13&#160;</title>
		<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/15/law-digest-51613/</link>
		<comments>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/15/law-digest-51613/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Special Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court of special appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyrecord.com/?p=239879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/15/law-digest-51613/&amp;text=Law digest &#8211; 5/16/13&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
MARYLAND COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS  Administrative Law, Consent Order: Where physician agreed to be bound by the terms of the Consent Order suspending her license, in which she waived any right to contest the terms and to appeal and acknowledged that she understood the Consent Order&#8217;s meaning and effect, the Board of Physicians did not [...]
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/15/law-digest-51613/&amp;text=Law digest &#8211; 5/16/13&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/15/law-digest-51613/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinions &#8211; 5/16/13: Maryland Court of Special Appeals&#160;</title>
		<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/15/opinions-51613-maryland-court-of-special-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/15/opinions-51613-maryland-court-of-special-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Special Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court of special appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyrecord.com/?p=239877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/15/opinions-51613-maryland-court-of-special-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 5/16/13: Maryland Court of Special Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
Administrative Law Consent Order  BOTTOM LINE: Where physician agreed to be bound by the terms of the Consent Order suspending her license, in which she waived any right to contest the terms and to appeal and acknowledged that she understood the Consent Order’s meaning and effect, the Board of Physicians did not err in declining [...]
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/15/opinions-51613-maryland-court-of-special-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 5/16/13: Maryland Court of Special Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/15/opinions-51613-maryland-court-of-special-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law digest &#8211; 5/9/13&#160;</title>
		<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/law-digest-5913/</link>
		<comments>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/law-digest-5913/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 22:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyrecord.com/?p=239402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/law-digest-5913/&amp;text=Law digest &#8211; 5/9/13&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS  Constitutional Law, Preemption of local tobacco regulation: State law occupies field of regulating packaging and sale of tobacco products, and thus impliedly preempted county ordinances regulating packaging, sale and distribution of cigars. Altadis U.S.A., Inc. v. Prince George’s County, No. 85, Sept. Term, 2010. RecordFax No. 13-0425-23, 15 pages. Criminal Law, [...]
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/law-digest-5913/&amp;text=Law digest &#8211; 5/9/13&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/law-digest-5913/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinions &#8211; 5/9/13: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals&#160;</title>
		<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/opinions-5913-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/opinions-5913-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 22:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th u.s. circuit court of appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyrecord.com/?p=239399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/opinions-5913-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 5/9/13: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
Administrative Law Security clearance  BOTTOM LINE: District court properly dismissed intelligence agency employee’s claim that his top secret security clearance was wrongly revoked by government agency, because although employee’s complaint set forth various constitutional claims, these claims merely challenged merits of agency’s security clearance decision, and courts lack subject matter jurisdiction to review merits of [...]
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/opinions-5913-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 5/9/13: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/opinions-5913-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinions &#8211; 5/9/13: Maryland Court of Appeals&#160;</title>
		<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/opinions-5913-maryland-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/opinions-5913-maryland-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 21:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyrecord.com/?p=239395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/opinions-5913-maryland-court-of-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 5/9/13: Maryland Court of Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
Constitutional Law Preemption of local tobacco regulation  BOTTOM LINE: State law occupies field of regulating packaging and sale of tobacco products, and thus impliedly preempted county ordinances regulating packaging, sale and distribution of cigars. CASE: Altadis U.S.A., Inc. v. Prince George’s County, No. 85, Sept. Term, 2010 (filed Apr. 25, 2013) (Judges Bell, Harrell, Battaglia, [...]
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/opinions-5913-maryland-court-of-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 5/9/13: Maryland Court of Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/08/opinions-5913-maryland-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law digest &#8211; 5/2/13&#160;</title>
		<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/law-digest-5213/</link>
		<comments>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/law-digest-5213/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 22:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th u.s. circuit court of appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyrecord.com/?p=238883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/law-digest-5213/&amp;text=Law digest &#8211; 5/2/13&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS  Negligence, Immunity: Neither the Good Samaritan Act nor the Fire and Rescue Act relieves a commercial ambulance company of civil liability for the alleged negligence of an employee committed when an emergency arises during a transfer of a patient between medical facilities. TransCare Maryland, Inc. v. Murray, No. 24, Sept. Term, [...]
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/law-digest-5213/&amp;text=Law digest &#8211; 5/2/13&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/law-digest-5213/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinions &#8211; 5/2/13: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals&#160;</title>
		<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/opinions-5213-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/opinions-5213-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 22:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th u.s. circuit court of appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyrecord.com/?p=238881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/opinions-5213-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 5/2/13: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
Contract Law Breach of implied contract  BOTTOM LINE: District court properly dismissed plaintiffs’ contract, negligence, and fraud claims against bank arising from bank’s denial of plaintiffs’ application for mortgage modification under federal program for struggling homeowners, because bank’s provision of mortgage modification application to homeowners did not give rise to implied-in-fact contract that plaintiffs’ application [...]
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/opinions-5213-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 5/2/13: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/opinions-5213-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinions &#8211; 5/2/13: Maryland Court of Appeals&#160;</title>
		<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/opinions-5213-maryland-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/opinions-5213-maryland-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 22:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyrecord.com/?p=238879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/opinions-5213-maryland-court-of-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 5/2/13: Maryland Court of Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
Negligence Immunity  BOTTOM LINE: Neither the Good Samaritan Act nor the Fire and Rescue Act relieves a commercial ambulance company of civil liability for the alleged negligence of an employee committed when an emergency arises during a transfer of a patient between medical facilities. CASE: TransCare Maryland, Inc. v. Murray, No. 24, Sept. Term, 2012 [...]
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/opinions-5213-maryland-court-of-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 5/2/13: Maryland Court of Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/05/01/opinions-5213-maryland-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law digest &#8211; 4/25/13&#160;</title>
		<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/04/24/law-digest-42513/</link>
		<comments>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/04/24/law-digest-42513/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th u.s. circuit court of appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law digest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyrecord.com/?p=238386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/04/24/law-digest-42513/&amp;text=Law digest &#8211; 4/25/13&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS  Constitutional Law, Removal of elected official: Plaintiff was removed from office by operation of law on the day she was sentenced for misconduct in office while in office, notwithstanding the fact that she subsequently was afforded probation before judgment. Hall v. Prince George’s County Democratic Central Committee, No. 100, Sept. Term, [...]
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/04/24/law-digest-42513/&amp;text=Law digest &#8211; 4/25/13&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/04/24/law-digest-42513/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opinions &#8211; 4/25/13: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals&#160;</title>
		<link>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/04/24/opinions-42513-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/04/24/opinions-42513-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daily Record Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4th Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th u.s. circuit court of appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maryland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedailyrecord.com/?p=238384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/04/24/opinions-42513-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 4/25/13: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
Administrative Law Final agency action  BOTTOM LINE: District court lacked jurisdiction over town’s action, under the Administrative Procedure Act, seeking specific performance of commitments made by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in connection with a project in the town, because the alleged failure to implement a project in accordance with commitments was not “final [...]
<div class="twitterbutton" style="float: right; padding-left: 5px;"><a href="http://twitter.com/share?url=http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/04/24/opinions-42513-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/&amp;text=Opinions &#8211; 4/25/13: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals&nbsp;<span class="dmcss_key_icon"><img alt="(access required)" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins/tdc-paywall/images/key.gif" border=0/></span>&amp;via=&amp;related=DolcePixel"><img align="right" src="http://thedailyrecord.com/wp-content/plugins//easy-twitter-button/i/buttons/en/tweetn.png" style="border: none;" alt="" /></a></div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thedailyrecord.com/2013/04/24/opinions-42513-4th-u-s-circuit-court-of-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
