Jun 22, 2009 3
Law blog round-up
It’s a little late, but here’s your Monday round-up:
- John Bratt at Miller & Zois* comments on Baltimore City officials’ $5 million lawsuit against an Ocean City Domino’s for refusing to serve them and then not letting them leave: “Assuming the facts in the complaint are true, they are seeking $500,000.00 (5 million divided by ten) in damages for every minute they were stuck in the store. I’d think that was excessive if they were trapped in the Guantanamo Bay Domino’s, much less Ocean City. That ten minutes must have been hell on earth.” [* Ed. Note: We previously attributed Bratt's post to M&Z partner Ron Miller.]
- The Supreme Court will hear a 4th Circuit case about whether the government can civilly confine a sex offender after his sentence is up. HT: How Appealing.
- Did a debt collector violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by placing a “WWJD?” sticker on collection notices? (A commenter says, “Scourge moneylenders in the Temple, that’s what. I don’t see why a collection agency would do this in light of the Gospel statements of money and lending.”) HT: A Stitch in Haste.
- Are associates too casual with partners, or does this hiring partner just have a big ol’ superiority complex?
- Sonia Sotomayor wouldn’t make it as a newspaper reporter.



Recent Comments