Words will never hurt you?

Ohio State law professor Christopher M. Fairman offered his take Sunday about the controversy over the use of the word “retard.” Fairman said he would not be signing a petition championed by the Special Olympics to ban the use of “the r-word,” which is not surprising considering he is the author of this book.

There were two main points I took away from Fairman’s essay in The Washington Post:

  1. “Words themselves are not the culprit; the meaning we attach to them is, and such meanings change dramatically over time and across communities”
  2. “Invariably, negative connotations materialize around whatever new word is used. …This illustrates one of the recurring follies of speech restriction: While there may be another word to use, a negative connotation eventually is found. Offense – both given and taken – is inevitable.”

Fairman also notes courts have found government-backed “speech codes” unconstitutional.

Reaction to Fairman’s essay has been strong, including opposing views from Post columnist Michael Gerson and Timothy Shriver, president of the Special Olympics. And perhaps the most prominent opponent of the word “retard” lately has been Sarah Palin.

Washington Post readers had a chance to respond to Fairman as well during an online chat. What do you think of his position? Should “the r-word” be considered on par with “the n-word”?

One thought on “Words will never hurt you?

  1. How outrageous that out of the woodwork comes the comparison of glaringly different histories from which to push self-servitude in that Hollywood NOS reflex posture. I’m glad, that with all the issues abounding the disability community, there seems to be time for equivocation and homology. It isn’t a secret that this “n-word” holds a long, long, history of instrumentality, and was and still almost wholly used in a negative context. That simply is not the case as with the using the “r-word.” Enough with the twisting already. I second Fairman in NOT signing that pledge, and only when hell freezes over…or when connotation has been eclipsed by absolutism, would I ever reconsider the common sense ability to distinguish, DISTINCTION!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>