Mar 1, 2011 0
Among the objections defense lawyer Jim Sanders raised Monday during the Jacksonville gas station leak trial was to a statement a plaintiff made to a psychiatrist about Sanders’ client, Exxon Mobil Corp.
The plaintiff said Exxon will “drag out” residents’ case on appeal and referred to litigation related to the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill – still ongoing – as proof. (Sanders, incidentally, has defended the company in the Exxon Valdez case.)
Sanders said the statement, which he read aloud during a court recess, is “absolutely inadmissible.” The frustration over how long things might take is fair game, he said, but it was the plaintiff’s choice to join the mass-action lawsuit that led to the litigation, not Exxon’s.
“To put the blame on litigation … that cuts both ways,” Sanders said.
Charles G. Bernstein, one of the plaintiffs’ lawyers from The Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos PC, argued the statement should be allowed.