In-House Interrogatory

Ever wanted to rent a general counsel?

RENTWell, now you can. Starting this week a Massachusetts company called Daily General Counsel will dispatch in-house counsel to start-ups to give legal advice for a day.

An in-house attorney’s services for eight hours will cost $1,500.

The company’s model will not work for all start-up companies, like those embroiled in long-term litigation who need a more permanent attorney in-house. But others need legal help that can be accomplished in a day, like drawing up partnership agreements and sales contracts, making sure human resources policies follow the law and making a plan to negotiate a lease.

Here’s our question for you:

What do you think of this new company? Do you think its business model will be successful?

Leave a comment below or email me.

Need to Know:

Follow us on Twitter for In-House news and discussion: @TDRInHouse

Some final thoughts on ‘Jeopardy!’

Portrait of Martin Luther (Wikimedia Commons)

Now I know how Weird Al felt.

The one thing I couldn’t talk about in the interview I posted in this space Tuesday night about my experience on “Jeopardy!” was what actually happened on the show.

Honestly, I had forgotten some things until I watched Wednesday night, such as how well I knew my six-letter anagrams. (Watching myself on television was kind of surreal. My family would cheer when I got answers right and groaned when I missed. “Don’t worry,” I said after a wrong answer. “Plenty of time for a comeback.”)

But I remembered exactly how the game ended. I was slightly disappointed to get the Daily Double on the second-t0-last clue in Double Jeopardy! because a) Astronomy is not my best category; and b) I wanted to make sure I had enough money to have a shot in Final Jeopardy!

I guessed right and was able to close the gap between first place and myself to under $3,000 before Final Jeopardy!

And then 16th Century People happened.

When I saw the Final Jeopardy! category, I immediately thought, “This is going to be either very easy or very hard.” A couple of explorers’ and artists’ names crossed my mind, but not the person who ultimately turned out to be the correct answer. (He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named is pictured above.)

Once the clue was revealed, all I could think of was, “The pope.” I figured that would be too generic but nothing else came to mind, so I went with my first instinct. (Most people I’ve talked to since the show aired said they thought of the pope as well. Even Alex Trebek told us after the show that was a hard question.)

I also knew, once the clue was revealed, that I would lose. In my preparation for the show, I decided that I was going to bet on myself in Final Jeopardy! That is, I didn’t want to bet $0, get the answer right and lose because I didn’t add to my total score. So I assumed both myself and the person in first place would get the answer correct and that I could go over-the-top with my bet.

My wife and a friend who is a professional poker player both pointed out that if we both were to get the question right, I would probably lose no matter what. This would mean I should bet a small amount of money (say, under $1,000) and assume first place would get the answer wrong, with my response not being a factor.

I had not thought about that, and that was the right strategy. But in the heat of the game, and with only a few minutes to figure out my gameplan, I decided to go big.

And I would probably do it again if in the same situation.I went to California with nothing and came back with a tote bag, a hat, $2,000, no regrets and the experience of a lifetime.

In related news, I’m now accepting offers to join Trivia Night teams.

In-House Interrogatory

mediationIn-House Interrogatory will be mediating a discussion on mediation this week.

According to an article in Corporate Counsel, preparation is an in-house counsel’s best defense.

The article recommends to review jury instructions, determine applicable statutes and case law and review third parties and insurers before even scheduling a mediation.

The article also recommends obtaining an initial written discovery, records, depositions of major players, contracts, photos, reports, and third party investigations before going into a mediation.

Here’s our question for you:

What is the best way to prepare for a mediation?

Leave a comment below or email me.

Need to Know:

Follow us on Twitter for In-House news and discussion: @TDRInHouse

Two ‘Jeopardy!’ contestants with all of the answers

Emily Goodlander Jeopardy!

Emily Goodlander with Alex Trebek. (Courtesy of Emily Goodlander)

Here’s the full transcript of a conversation I had last week with Emily Goodlander, my fellow contestant on an episode of “Jeopardy!” that airs Wednesday night.

Danny Jacobs: Why did you want to be on “Jeopardy!”?

Emily Goodlander: I think that every attorney secretly has this desire to be on “Jeopardy!” one day. It could just be me, but when you see the number of attorneys on each year, I think it’s a real high percentage.

DJ: Do you think it helps being an attorney?

EG: No. And I’m so glad they didn’t have a question or a category about law because those are the ones the attorneys always bomb in because we always overthink everything.

DJ:That was my worst nightmare, having a category I should know about, like the Ravens, and miss the question, that would’ve killed me. I think journalists are the same way. I think a lot of us spend every day being an expert on different topics and so we think that we’re just going to go on and know everything.

I’ve wanted to be on [“Jeopardy!”], I think for a while in the back of my mind. I’ve always liked trivia and game shows and news quizzes and filled my mind with a lot of useless information. It was only my girlfriend, now my wife, who pushed me to try out. And when she did that, it kind of all just happened.

DJ: It happened really quickly, too, I was surprised.

Did you get the call in September?

EG: I did. It was the best of times it was the worst of times because I was coming into work and getting onto the highway ramp and I rear-ended the car in front of me. And, full disclosure, this has already been adjudicated and everything. So I messed up the front of my car, her car is OK but I can’t move my car and I’m blocking the on-ramp, which makes morning commuters very happy, as I’m sure you can imagine. I’m waiting for the police and tow truck and I’m standing on the side of the road, emailing work “Hey, I’ve been in a car accident and I’m going to be in late.” And my phone rings with a number I don’t know and I think it’s the tow truck and I answer and it’s Glenn [Kagan, a “Jeopardy!” producer]. He’s like, “Hey Emily, it’s Glenn. How’s Baltimore?” And I’m saying, “Baltimore’s great.” I have no idea who Glenn is. And he says, “Are you still available to do “Jeopardy!”? It was really funny.

DJ: Wow, I had kind of a similar… it was actually just a best of times day because we had just closed on our house and so we’re moving in, we just got there, we’re just getting situated. And I get this call from California on my phone. And I’m thinking, “Who is calling me from California?” And it’s “Hi, it’s Corina [Nusu, another “Jeopardy!” producer] you’re going to be on the show.” I was like, “Wow! That’s great!” And I told my wife and she was ecstatic and she called her family but I was like, I want to get moving. I have all of these boxes here, I have to put stuff together, I kind of just forgot about it. I made a couple of calls and then went right back to work.

How was your studying or “studying”?

EG: It’s funny when I think about it because I right now, in addition to working a full work week I’m preparing for the Maryland Bar, which is a lot of studying. And studying for “Jeopardy!” is much more pleasurable. It’s slightly harder because it’s a completely open universe. At least for the Bar exam I know what to expect. But I sort of enjoyed studying. I think I picked out key categories that I thought would come up.

DJ: Did you watch a lot of shows?

EG: I didn’t have time to, which I was sort of… well, I don’t want to say I was upset about. I think watching the show gets you into the rhythm of it and helps you figure out what they’re looking for in the various categories.

DJ: I hadn’t watched much after I did my audition, I mean when it was on I would watch occasionally but I wasn’t glued to the television. Once I found out [I was going to be on], I DVR’d it and got, like the season pass. I was watching every day, taking notes. I was using the remote as a buzzer to try to practice.

EG: That is really smart.

DJ: It didn’t really help but… there was a website that has all these old “Jeopardy!” games catalogued, so I would go on there, during work hours, and play 2-3 games at a time just to, like you said, pick up on hints. A lot of categories repeat themselves, a lot of clues are the same. But I felt like… you can’t really study. You just have to know what you know.

EG: Yeah. You just have to fill your brain with information and take it from there.

DJ: When did it hit you that you were going to be on the show?

EG: Probably when I got on the plane to go to L.A. I had a very, very busy month during September and October, so I was working 60-hour weeks and I didn’t really have time to stress about it or get anxious about it. So I was on the plane to L.A. and had packed some books and things to review and I was like, “Oh my gosh, this is tomorrow.”

DJ: – Yeah, when I got on the plane, that was the first time, when I got to the hotel and they said, “You’re here for ‘Jeopardy!’?” and I said, “Yeah, that’s me.” And then the last time was when we walked and saw the stage. It was like, ‘Here we are, this is actually happening.’

EG: Yes, it’s very cool. I kept expecting to show up at the hotel and, “I’m sorry, “Jeopardy!”? We don’t have you on the list for that,” one of those things.

DJ: Were you nervous at all up there?

EG: Once I got to the show? I think it was a bit different for me because I was there Tuesday and of course they pull the names randomly, so you’re in this state of chronic anticipation. [Note: The show tapes five episodes per day, Tuesdays and Wednesdays.] Am I next? Am I next? And then it’s the end of the taping for the day and you haven’t gone. So you have all of this built-up anticipation and then it’s the next day and am I going to next? Am I going to go next? So I think more than anything, rather than being nervous, it was just exciting. It was just fun. I was so ready to get up there and take my turn.

Danny Jacobs Jeopardy!

Danny Jacobs with Alex Trebek. (Courtesy of Danny Jacobs)

DJ: I felt the anticipation, too. I didn’t want to be on the first show Wednesday, I to be able to at least see a show and… you got a whole day of watching, I wanted to see one and get a feel for it. I felt bad for the people who went on the first taping, that’s got to be rough.

EG: It is rough. And I remember sitting in the audience, because I didn’t know if we would be in the audience or be in the green room during the taping of the show. And I remember being in the audience watching some of these tapings and thinking, “Thank God I’m not on this show.”

DJ: Yes.

EG: Because I know nothing about the history of the Cadillac or one of those categories that was on there.

DJ: What’s the question people have been asking you the most since you got back?

EG: “Oh, can you tell me what happened?”

DJ: I get that and I also get, what’s Alex like?

EG: The “what’s Alex like” definitely. And “Did you meet Alex?” Which I think is a funny question to ask because if you’ve seen the show clearly there is interaction between you and Alex on the show.

What do you think was the most surprising thing to you?

DJ: How fast it went but how slow it went. …When we got up there and they started taping, I was like, “Here we go” and this was my last “This is happening” moment. Once they read the first clue and we started going, I felt better, like, I can do this. And then in the game, I felt like I could read everything and focus and answer and sort of process everything. But when it ended, it felt like it happened in five minutes.

EG: Exactly. I was really surprised by how small the stage was. It looks really massive on TV. The miracles of cameras I guess. I had no idea. I thought there would be a football field between us and the screen with how it looks on TV.

DJ: It can be very low-tech behind the scenes. I also didn’t realize the pedestals behind move up and down. I was always wondering how they get everyone to be the same height.

EG: Yes, I was wondering if they would bring out an apple crate or something since I’m on the shorter side.

DJ: Have you watched since you came back?

EG: I’ve watched a little bit but again I rarely get home in time to watch. But it’s been fun, especially during this past week to see a little bit of the show. Or hear people talk about it because those are the people I was out there with.

DJ: That’s right, you saw two weeks’ worth of shows.

EG: I know everything that happened. I know the person they’re talking about, the stories they’re talking about.

DJ: I have not watched since we were out there. And not because I’m bitter or upset or just – after that day, maybe you experienced this twice, I was so drained. I just wanted to do nothing. I know I saw you afterward and you looked spent as well.

EG: I was ready for a major nap.

DJ: And I had just no interest to watch. So I’ll tape next week because I know, like you said, what happened. So I haven’t watched, haven’t really paid attention. But as we’ve gotten closer, I’ve been getting excited.

EG: I’m really excited to watch because I think I’ve forgotten even the things I even rang into.

DJ: Yeah, I remember certain things but not the full day.

Have you gained any newfound appreciation for “Jeopardy!” contestants or the show?

EG: Absolutely. It’s tough. Watching “Jeopardy!” from home, it’s easy to say, “Where did they get these contestants? These people are idiots.” But being able to manage the buzzer very well is a huge, huge deal, and working under that pressure. And for returning champs, too. When you have 10-15 minutes between tapings, that’s exhausting.

DJ: People were asking me before I left, “What’s your buzzer strategy going to be?” kind of half-jokingly, but it really is. You really learn how much of it is about being able to buzz in. I don’t know about you, I felt like I knew the majority of the clues on the board, it was just a matter of being able to get in on time.

EG: I started thinking I should have worked on my thumb reflexes as much as the studying.

DJ: And you’re just kind of at the mercy as to how quick as you buzz. So watching now, I think I’ll understand that a lot of is, not luck, but a little bit of it is luck.

EG: You know, I think that probably when the three of us were finally up there on stage, the three of us shared likely 95 percent of the same knowledge base, and if [the clues] were given to us in the format of a test that we would have achieved probably the same score. It just really comes down to who’s buzzing in the fastest.

DJ: And when I was watching to prepare, I notice the people that were calm did a better job and were able to get their answers out. And watching people now, people that look nervous now I’ll understand why they look nervous. It’s not just flop-sweat. It’s intense.

EG: It’s definitely nerve-wracking. One of my personal strategies – not that it played out much to my advantage necessarily – during the taping was unless it was a Daily Double I didn’t look at the money that was on the board. I think that’s really dangerous. Because once you look up there and you start thinking, “I’m behind by this,” “This person is catching up by this,” I think you psyche yourself out.

DJ: That’s smart. I think I did that subconsciously. …And you have to remember, too, the money is real but it’s not real. You don’t have it yet.

EG: Oh, yeah, it’s the house money. That’s definitely the mindset that I went in with, that this going to be a great, fun experience and I can’t lose anything. Other than my dignity.

DJ: Well I think we both kept it, a little bit.

EG: As long as I was excluded from Final “Jeopardy!” for being in the hole.

DJ: Yes, once we got to Final “Jeopardy!”, I said, “We’re good.”

Has it been hard to keep the results from people?

EG: People have respected it pretty well, and being an attorney I think I’m inherently able to lock bits of information away and don’t have the impetus to shout them from the rooftops. …For me, it hasn’t really been difficult.

When I got home, my mom wanted to know immediately and my dad was on the other side. He wants it to be a completely exciting episode for him.

DJ: Oh, really? He doesn’t know?

EG: Anything, which I think is really fun.

DJ: Good for him. I talked to family after we were done that taping day, and that was really good to get it out. I told a couple people at work because I couldn’t last that long. But after that people have been kind of cool and they understand you can’t talk about it. I think they want to be surprised, too, and see how it goes.

EG: I haven’t told a single soul unless they were in the taping room.

DJ: Have you been invited to a lot trivia nights and quiz competitions by people?

EG: I have, sort of informally… “Emily’s been on “Jeopardy!”, we have to have her on our pub trivia night team.”

DJ: Yeah, I feel like there’s so much pressure on us now to be on these teams, and to win now, too.

EG: The funny part is, ever since the online test commercials have been airing, I’ve been getting random emails and Facebook messages from people I haven’t spoken to in years. [Note: Contestants at Tuesday’s taping filmed a commercial encouraging people to take the “Jeopardy!” online contestant test]  …The most frequent response from them, when I tell them that I am [going to be on “Jeopardy!”] is you have officially satisfied what I thought a smart person was in fifth grade.

DJ: A lot of people have told me they figured I would be on the show one day. I think no matter what happens [on the show], a lot of people will say, ‘Wow, that’s so cool, you were on “Jeopardy!”.’

EG: Exactly. Well, if you come in third in the New York Marathon, not too shabby.

UMCarey receives gift for female leadership program

A female leadership program at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law received a belated holiday gift this week.

DollarThe Marjorie Cook Foundation gave the Women, Leadership & Equality Program a $100,000 gift, the law school announced Tuesday.

The money will allow the program, which focuses on gender issues in the legal profession, to expand its curriculum and maintain the positions of the program’s fellows at nonprofits like House of Ruth and the Maryland and National Women’s Law Centers.

“Because of the Foundation’s generosity we have had the ability for the last decade to educate more than 90 students selected as Rose Zetzer Fellows in the theory and practice of gender equality for women in our profession,” program founder and professor Paula Monopoli said in a statement.

The program was initially founded with the help of a $250,000 gift from the Marjorie Cook Foundation.


The Maryland appellate court cases that weren’t

court opinionsA visit to the “Appellate Opinions” page on the Maryland Judiciary website early Thursday afternoon did not show “2014″ available under filing year, meaning no opinions have been released in January by the Court of Appeals or Court of Special Appeals.

Or have there been?

When I selected “All” under filing year, a list of court opinions came up. At the top were two opinions dated Jan. 1, 2014:  “Navy v. Army” and “State v. State.”

I felt as if I had entered a code in a video game to reach some secret level. I would be scooping the world about a lawsuit between the Navy and the Army!

Alas, when I clicked on the links, there only was a nearly-blank page with “Test COSA Opinion” written in small type at the top.

A Judiciary spokesman told me Thursday afternoon that the items were posted before the holidays as tests of the system. By 5:30 p.m. Thursday, the case names had been changed to “Test.”

So we’ll have to wait at least another day for our first Judge Harrell footnote of 2014.

In-House Interrogatory

For general counsels, it’s always business. Not personal.

Godfather_puppetmasterOr so Tom Hagen, the adviser to The Godfather in the film trilogy, would say.

Attorney Daniel Doktori, who is an associate in the emerging companies practice at WilmerHale in New York City, said in an article that the role of general counsel at a start-up company is much like the role of consigliere, the position made famous by Hagan, played by Robert Duvall, in The Godfather film series.

“Being general counsel is like being Tom Hagen in The Godfather – you’re a Consigliere,” said a New York City lawyer quoted in the article. “You need to understand where the founders are coming from – the sacrifices they had to go through to build their business.”

Doktori says start-ups hire attorneys who will be able to fit into the company culture of taking risks.

Here’s our question for you:

Do you agree with this philosophy? Is your job equatable to the (legal) version of the Corleone family’s consigliere?

Leave a comment below or email me.

Need to Know:

  • A lawsuit seeking to remove Jacksonville’s general counsel from office has been dropped.
  • Deutsche Bank names a new co-deputy general counsel for Germany.
  • Halliburton’s general counsel retired and the company filled the position at the beginning of the year.
  • A former Air Force general counsel was appointed as Homeland Security secretary.

Follow us on Twitter for In-House news and discussion: @TDRInHouse

Appeals court gives red light to speed camera lawsuit

James Liskow

James Liskow (File photo)

Bowie lawyer James Liskow beat a speed camera ticket in Montgomery County three years ago based on what was essentially a typo.

In a nutshell, the law as written required police to include with the citation the county plan describing the location of the speed camera and a signed certificate showing the camera passed an annual inspection — “a phone book full of artifacts” as Liskow told me at the time.

A similar due process argument was made in a putative class-action lawsuit against the towns of Riverdale Park and Forest Heights, filed in April 2012 in U.S. District Court, with Liskow representing the plaintiffs. A federal judge granted a defense motion for summary judgment in November 2012, finding in part that he could not enforce state constitutional laws.

The plaintiffs appealed the decision. On Tuesday, a three-judge panel for 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously affirmed the lower-court ruling, finding the plaintiffs’ due process rights had not been violated.

“Appellants fail to identify any element of the disputed procedures that equate to egregious official conduct unjustified by the state interest in traffic enforcement,” the opinion states. “…Any flaws in the citation or enforcement process could have been challenged in the state courts, and Appellants failed to do so.”

The appellate court similarly rejected an argument that electronic signatures on citations cannot be admitted as sworn testimony at trial because it is unknown whether the testimony is based on “personal knowledge, information and belief.”

Finally, the appellate panel found citations do not need to be sent via certified mail to satisfy due process.

“[N]othing presented to us indicates that the United States Postal Service delivers certified mail at a rate so superior to that of first-class mail that we should declare first-class mail not reasonably calculated to provide actual notice,” the opinion states.

Crime doesn’t pay but it might not harm your reelection chances

News came out Thursday that U.S. Rep.  Trey Radel, R-Fla., will be returning to Capitol Hill next week after a leave of absence. Radel, you may remember, pleaded guilty in November for possession of cocaine and is under investigation from by the House Ethics Committee for his drug use.

Trey Radel

Rep. Trey Radel

With Radel’s reelection prospects uncertain, potential challengers are weighing their options and opposition money begins to flow into southwest Florida.

Could Radel win reelection, though? It wouldn’t be the first time a politician in trouble with the law was kept in office. (A certain politician in Toronto will be testing this theory in October, too.) Which brings us to this gem of a footnote brought to my attention by my former TDR colleague, Andy Marso, on Twitter.

It concerns an appeal by Percy Z. Giles, a longtime Chicago alderman who was sentenced to more than three years in jail in 2001 for racketeering and mail fraud, among other charges.

Giles won a special election for his seat in 1986 and won four-year terms in 1987, 1991, 1995 and 1999, according to an opinion by 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals written by the late Judge Terence T. Evans. Giles prevailed in the ’99 election “despite the fact he was under the dark cloud of the indictment in this case,” Evans wrote, prompting the judge to include the following footnote:

In the old days, an indictment charging 13 felonies would have been the kiss of death for a politician. Apparently that is no longer the case.

The appellate court upheld Giles’ conviction.

(Evans, it should also be noted, was no stranger to a good footnote.)

T-shirt satirist, NSA nearing settlement?


Dan McCall’s parody of the National Security Agency seal, above, was pulled off a printer’s website due to a cease-and-desist letter it received from the agency. (Courtesy of Paul Alan Levy)

Dan McCall soon might not have reason to sell his “Censored by the NSA” and “Censored by the DHS” T-shirts anymore.

Back in October, McCall, a Minnesota activist, sued the National Security Agency and Department of Homeland Security for violating his First Amendment rights when they issued cease-and-desist letters against his merchandise.

McCall is the proprietor of, which sells T-shirts, mugs and posters, many with satirical images he creates. One of his creations, from earlier this year, placed a slogan below the NSA’s official seal: “The only part of the government that actually listens.”

Now, both sides “are currently in discussion to resolve the case,” according to a court filing Friday by the government agencies. The agencies have asked for the deadline to respond to the complaint be moved to the middle of February. McCall’s lawyer agreed Tuesday to extend the deadline, according to the filing.

The agencies’ response was supposed to be due Jan. 6.

U.S. District Court Senior Judge Marvin J. Garbis had not made a decision on the motion as of Friday afternoon.