Semiconductor companies are whipping up a new generation of chips to bring richer video and better battery life to personal computers and help them hold off threats from tablets and increasingly powerful smart phones.
Intel Corp. and Advanced Micro Devices Inc., whose processors are the “brains” of PCs, are unveiling significant changes to their chips’ designs at this week’s International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.
Tablet computers and other gadgets have taken on many of the tasks once performed by PCs, and there already are signs that those devices — led by Apple Inc.’s iPad — are eating away at PC sales.
Intel and AMD are responding with new chips designed to make people think twice before picking a tablet over a new PC. The new chips won’t dampen tablets’ success, but they will make traditional, low-cost computers more competitive — by making them better at doing graphics-intensive tasks and playing video.
The improvements that Intel and AMD make to their products are felt with every keystroke or click of a mouse, even if most computer buyers aren’t paying attention to the intricacies of chip design.
For example, users have come to expect the benefits of Moore’s Law, even if they don’t know the technical specifics underlying the prediction that computer processors’ performance will double every two years. The principle has guided the industry for more than 40 years, and is a key reason why computers have gotten smarter even as they’ve gotten smaller.
One major change in chip design that Moore’s Law enabled and consumers felt came several years ago. That’s when Intel and AMD took chips known as “memory controllers,” which historically have been separate from a computer’s main processor, and put them on the same piece of silicon as the processor itself.
The controllers act as middlemen between the processor and a computer’s memory. Shortening the distance between the parts cuts the amount of time they needed to talk to each other, helping the computers work faster.
A similar thing is happening in the new generation of chips.
This time, Intel and AMD have thrown another feature — graphics, which also historically was handled by a separate chip — and onto the same silicon as the computer’s main, general-purpose processor.
By coupling graphics more tightly with a computer’s main processor, there’s another benefit besides faster communication. The power the parts need to talk to each other also is reduced, leading to longer battery life.
What’s happening in chips is akin to what’s happened with cell phones: Technical innovations mean more stuff can fit into a smaller space. In the case of computer processors, Moore’s Law is driven by the fact that transistors, the tiny on-off switches that regulate the flow of data in computer chips, keep getting smaller.
“It’s a natural evolution of integration,” said Jon Peddie, who studies the semiconductor industry as president of Jon Peddie Research. “We keep putting more and more stuff into the processor — now it’s graphics’ turn to get shoved into the processor along with all the stuff that previous generations have shoved in. The big difference this time is because of the processors’ smaller size, the capability of the graphics is significantly better.”
With the current chips, cheap, low-end laptops are largely poor at playing high-quality video, a task too taxing for the machines’ underpowered chips. Those laptops, which also include so-called “netbooks,” likely will benefit first from the new chip designs, said Martin Reynolds, a vice president and research fellow at Gartner Inc. who studies the computer market.
Intel and AMD are using different technical approaches, but the results are similar: Consumers should expect “snappier operations in anything involving pixel movement,” from playing games to editing photos and video and preparing PowerPoint and other visually rich presentations, Peddie said.
Peddie cautions that even with the new chips, low-end computers still will be too weak for certain uses, including graphics-intensive video games. The changes could eliminate the need for many people to buy separate graphics cards, which can add hundreds of dollars to the price of a PC. The shift presents an opportunity for Intel and AMD, which can charge higher prices for chips with built in, higher quality graphics capabilities. Intel doesn’t mind if people buy fewer graphics cards since it doesn’t sell them. Intel’s graphics have been built into its “chipsets,” yet another type of chip inside computers that handles a range of tasks.
The situation is more delicate for AMD, which does make the cards. AMD hopes that stealing even small amounts of business from Intel offsets any risks to graphics-card sales.