Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

AFSCME tentatively agrees to 3-year deal

AFSCME Maryland Director Patrick Moran

AFSCME Maryland Director Patrick Moran

The O’Malley administration and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees have tentatively agreed on a three-year contract that would turn furloughs into paid days off, give employees a $750 bonus, and schedule raises and cost-of-living adjustments.

The roughly 24,000 members of AFSCME, which represents the vast majority of state employees, are voting to ratify the contract. The contract proposal was finalized within the last week, state and union officials say, and was posted on AFSCME’s website this week. If the new contract is approved by the time voting closes on Jan. 31, it will take effect July 1, the first day of fiscal 2012.

AFSCME Maryland Director Patrick Moran said that the union’s team of 40 negotiators has been working on the new contract for about six months.

“It was tough, considering the conditions the state is in right now,” Moran said. “Our feeling is that we have endured several cuts in the last few years. There have been furloughs, unpaid days off, changes in health care. We have been trying to get those sacrifices to be recognized in the contract.”

Gov. Martin O’Malley’s spokesman Shaun Adamec said that the governor entered negotiations with the same goal.

“It was a very specific objective the governor had going into talks: Despite economic challenges, he was interested in finding a way to pay back the employees,” Adamec said.

O’Malley’s Chief of Staff Matt Gallagher agreed, saying employees have suffered quite a bit with more than 25 unpaid furlough days in the last three years.

The proposed contract includes:

-A $750 bonus in fiscal 2012, which begins July 1.

-Five paid furlough days — reclassified as paid administrative leave — for the years represented in the contract.

-Depending on revenues, a 2 percent COLA in 2013.

-Depending on revenues, a 3 percent COLA in 2014.

-If there are enough increased revenues, reinstating of step salary increases starting April 1, 2014.

-Guaranteeing raises for employees working at jobs above their current pay grades.

-Holding down increases in insurance costs for fiscal year 2012.

Adamec said that the provisions of the new contract should cost about $39 million in fiscal 2012. However, the state is anticipating a savings of $40 million in the next fiscal year from employees who have taken buyouts, freeing up money for the contract.

As for the years after 2012, the government has safeguards to ensure that the state’s coffers are not severely affected. In 2013 and 2014, the state can negotiate to get rid of the promised COLA if revenues are $150 million below projections.

“We can’t spend money that isn’t there,” Adamec said.

Conversely, the union can negotiate for a larger COLA in 2013 and 2014 if state revenues are more than $300 million above projections.

All parties said that the negotiations were neither easy nor difficult, but they ended with a tentative agreement in place.

The union’s current contract is set to expire on June 30, Adamec said. In general, there is an understanding that contracts expiring during the fiscal year should be renegotiated by the end of the calendar year — so Adamec said the AFSCME contract was expected to be finished on Dec. 31. According to that schedule, Adamec said it was “a couple weeks late.”

Whether the contract is adopted is up to union members.  Moran said he is confident that they will ratify the contract.

“Given the incentives, employees will vote for it,” Moran said. “They will end with money in their pockets at the end of the day.”

One comment

  1. FEES. What is it with this story? Did AFSCME type it and send the exact same story out to all newspapers? Did you bother to do any research? Did you look at the contract? Did you not notice the fees that go into effect 7/1st?

    Do the math!

    It really kills me how news sources only tell half of a story. I mean, how about the fees? Is it not newsworthy that 18,000 non union members will find deductions from their paychecks (automatically without authorization) beginning July 1st whether or not the legislature approves what’s in this contract or not? Or, the fact that at least half of those 18,000 employees have no clue that’s going to occur because it was not written in the letter sent out the way it is written into the contract.

    If the legislature decides to say “BONUS?, are you kidding us? We have a 1.6 billion dollar deficit we can’t give bonuses!”, the union fees still start being deducted on July 1st. Instead of concentrating on things that are really needed at times like this, like seniority rights during layoffs, we get promises based on a wing and a prayer that the legislature will most likely laugh at.