1 Year
$319
----------
Digital & Mobile
Special Monthly Autorenew Rate
$19
----------
Print & Digital+E-Auction
1 Year
$389
Enter your user name and password in the fields above to gain access to the subscriber content on this site.
Your subscription includes one set of login credentials for your exclusive use. Security features have been integrated on this site: If someone signs in with your credentials while you are logged in, the site will automatically close your ongoing login and you will lose access at that time.
To inquire about group subscriptions or an enterprise site license for your organization, contact Tracy Bumba.
If you feel your login credentials are being used by a second party, contact customer service at 877-615-9536 for assistance in changing your password.Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here.
You and your friend are a little out of date on what’s happening in law schools.
Just about every school in the country has an extensive practice based curriculum, and many schools require students to take one or more of this type of course. Ironically, students often resent the requirement and complain about the courses. As for the W&L program, it was the “brain child” of a recent dean at W&L who strong-armed a reluctant faculty into going along with it and then bailed out about two-thirds of the way into its implementation to become president of a small southern university. A lot of people who know the situation well think of it as a monument to opportunism as much as curricular innovation. It’s no surprise that someone at W&L would describe the program as a success, what else would they say – that they were left holding the bag? As for its effects on W&L’s ability to place its students in Biglaw jobs, there’s no need to take the Schools’s word for it. The National Law Journal has just published its annual survey ranking the best feeder law schools for Biglaw (i.e., the NLJ 250), and W&L’s numbers were underwhelming. It ranked 50th in the survey, for example, well below the University of Maryland School of Law School, to use a local case, which ranked 38th (sending more than twice as many graduates to Biglaw as W&L). You really ought to do research on stories making empirical claims and not rely on gossip, distant memory, and the random musings of citizens on the street. You could mislead people into thinking that their stereotypes were fact.
Pushkin seems a little unnecessarily nasty here.
I think that law school could safely cut out the entire third year, or make it optional. This will never happen because law schools generally are essentially profit-making institutions, even those that claim to be non-profits. You need a law library but most of the materials have lasting value; you need some lawyers (easy to find) to staff the faculty, and that’s about it. No cyclotron, no million-dollar grant money from the DoD or NIH.