Maryland Daily Record Maryland's trusted source for business and legal news
Complete access to news articles on this website is available to subscribers only. Subscribers may login at the login tab, below. Others may join our audience of successful Marylanders with a subscription today.
Print, Digital & Mobile
1 Year
$319
----------
Digital & Mobile
Special Monthly Autorenew Rate
$19
----------
Print & Digital+E-Auction
1 Year
$389
1 Year
$319
----------
Digital & Mobile
Special Monthly Autorenew Rate
$19
----------
Print & Digital+E-Auction
1 Year
$389
Enter your user name and password in the fields above to gain access to the subscriber content on this site.
Your subscription includes one set of login credentials for your exclusive use. Security features have been integrated on this site: If someone signs in with your credentials while you are logged in, the site will automatically close your ongoing login and you will lose access at that time.
To inquire about group subscriptions or an enterprise site license for your organization, contact Tracy Bumba.
If you feel your login credentials are being used by a second party, contact customer service at 877-615-9536 for assistance in changing your password.Already a paid subscriber but not registered for online access yet? For instructions on how to get premium web access, click here.
The court explained that its ruling was prompted in part by the fact that the MySpace printout “was a key component of the” prosecution’s case, but noted it was not suggesting “that printouts from social networking sites should never be admitted.” Griffin No. 2. It suggested that “avenues . . . to properly authenticate a posting or a profile printed from a social networking site will continue to develop as” efforts to use data from such sites increases. Federally, some of the uncertainty involving evidence printed from social networking sites has been addressed by embracing the notion of `conditional relevancy,’ pursuant to Federal Rule 104(b), which provides `[w]hen the relevancy of evidence depends upon the fulfillment of a condition of fact, the court shall admit it upon, or subject to, the introduction of evidence sufficient to support a finding of the fulfillment of the condition.’