Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

State senator wants law clinic to support farmers

ANNAPOLIS — A Maryland legislator wants to transfer funding from an embattled University of Maryland environmental law clinic to create a similar program for farmers as retribution for the clinic’s attempt to sue a chicken farm over water pollution.

The budget amendment proposal from state Sen. Richard Colburn, R-Dorchester, is spurred by the clinic’s representation of the Waterkeeper Alliance Inc., which is suing Hudson Farm, a Worcester County chicken farm that supplies Perdue. The plaintiff claims the family-owned farm is polluting a nearby waterway.

The move would transfer $500,000 from the law clinic’s lobby shop to establish an agricultural law clinic at the University of Baltimore School of Law. The entire Senate Budget and Taxation Committee would have to consider it.

Sen. David Brinkley, R-Frederick, who supported Colburn’s plan, said it was unclear how much backing the amendment would get from the entire General Assembly.

Lawmakers and Gov. Martin O’Malley, a Democrat, have criticized the clinic at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law for pursuing the lawsuit and creating financial burden for Alan and Kristin Hudson, who own the farm.

“It certainly is a direct rebuke to the school and the way they handled this whole thing,” Brinkley said.

The fund transfer targets the salaries of three lobbyists and the money they spend to rent office space.

Under Colburn’s budget amendment, the clinic at UB would assist farmers “with estates and trusts issues, compliance with environmental laws, and other matters necessary to preserve family farms.”

Colburn has also introduced legislation that would require the environmental law clinic to reimburse the Hudsons for their legal expenses. That bill was heard by the Budget and Taxation Committee in February, but has not been voted on.

Last week, a federal judge denied cross-motions for summary judgment in the case, allowing it to proceed to a mid-April bench trial.


  1. If sanctioning the university clinic for fulfilling its ethical obligations to see the matter through wasn’t enough, the local legislators want to strip the clinic of funding to create a new clinic just to support the farmers in this isolated action? This seems a lot like the recently-covered UB law school tax…except that the legislature now intends to tax UM to provide UB with adequate funding to defend some outlaw chicken farmers. Nice.

  2. The law school does provide services for farmers through its partnership with Civil Justice Inc. Low bono attorneysthrough Civil Justice, as well as students volunteering at Civil Justice, are ready able and willing to aid family farmers with their legal needs.