Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Attorneys in WikiLeaks case argue over access to emails

FORT MEADE — Lawyers for a young Army private accused of leaking a trove of classified information to the website WikiLeaks said Tuesday that military prosecutors have withheld hundreds of emails related to his pretrial detention at a Marine Corps brig.

David Coombs, a lawyer for Pfc. Bradley Manning, argued at a pretrial hearing that prosecutors have yet to turn over about 700 emails in their possession. But he said the emails he’s already aware of paint a portrait of a military more concerned with combating negative publicity than with Manning’s welfare and reveal that high-level officials, including a three-star general, were briefed about the conditions of his confinement.

Prosecutors denied the allegations and said the general was justifiably anxious about Manning’s condition and that he was a suicide risk.

Manning, 24, is accused of providing to WikiLeaks hundreds of thousands of diplomatic cables and Iraq and Afghanistan war logs while working as an intelligence analyst in Baghdad in 2009 and 2010. He faces a possible life sentence. Military prosecutors and defense lawyers have been hashing out procedural and evidentiary disputes during an ongoing pretrial hearing ahead of a trial scheduled for early next year.

At issue Tuesday were nearly 1,400 emails pertaining to Manning’s maximum-security detention at the Marine Corps brig in Quantico, Va. While there, he was confined to a single-bed cell for 23-hours a day and. His clothing was taken from him for several nights until he was issued a suicide-prevention smock. The conditions mobilized and infuriated Manning supporters, who alleged torture and said he was illegally punished. He has since been relocated to medium-security confinement at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

Coombs said Manning was confined in such a way to prevent anything bad from happening to him, which the military knew would generate a crush of negative publicity.

“The main thing they were concerned about was being portrayed in a negative light,” he said.

He also said the emails show a three-star general at the brig was briefed in unusual detail about Manning’s stay.

“What he’s being briefed on is not something you would expect a three-star general to be briefed on,” he said, adding, “He’s being briefed on when I call, he’s being briefed on when people (who support Manning) are being turned away at the front gate.”

Ashden Fein, a military prosecutor, said the emails didn’t support Coombs’ theory or allegations. He said there was nothing unusual about a general being given regular briefings about an individual soldier’s confinement, especially one who was considered a suicide risk.

“A commander being notified of what’s going on (in) his installation is the way the military works,” Fein said.

Coombs also accused prosecutors of allowing the emails to “collect dusk” for at least six months despite defense lawyers’ requests to see them. Fein said prosecutors had other pressing priorities.

Prosecutors last month turned over 84 emails related to the Quantico detention and provided an additional 600 or so this week.

Army Col. Denise Lind, who is presiding over the hearing, directed prosecutors to provide her with the remaining 700 emails, and she said she would individually review them to determine which ones were relevant and could be disclosed.

The hearing continues Wednesday.

Lind dealt defense lawyers a blow last month when she largely barred Manning from presenting evidence at his trial that the mountain of classified information he’s accused of leaking did little harm to U.S. national security and foreign relations.

WikiLeaks, which has published numerous international diplomatic and military secrets, sees its mission as revealing secret information to the public.