Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Mortgage comeback? Citigroup isn’t so sure

NEW YORK — Citigroup isn’t as enthusiastic as its peers about a comeback in the housing market.

On Friday, executives at Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase declared that the long-struggling market had turned a corner. On Monday, Citigroup’s top number-cruncher said he wasn’t so sure.

In a conference call with reporters after the bank released its quarterly earnings, chief financial officer John Gerspach cautioned that recent history is littered with upturns in the housing market that proved short-lived.

He said that despite a few signs of stabilization in the housing market, there are “still some rather significant challenges to be faced.” He warned against predictions with the uncertain presidential election and federal budget still casting a shadow.

“I don’t use phrases like ‘turn the corner,'” Gerspach said, referring to statements Friday from JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon and Wells Fargo finance chief Tim Sloan. “I have difficulty seeing corners sometimes, so I’m not sure what corner we may have turned.”

“There’s still a question in my mind about whether we’ve got a strong enough economy to continue sustaining the housing market,” he added.

Citigroup reported earnings that beat analysts’ expectations, after stripping out one-time items like a big write-down it had to take because it got less money than it had hoped when it negotiated to sell its stake in its retail brokerage.

Investors were pleased with the results and sent the stock up more than 4 percent, rising $1.55 to $36.30 in afternoon trading.

Citigroup said that revenue was helped by mortgage refinancing, the same as at Wells Fargo and JPMorgan. Some of that business, however, is fueled by government programs to encourage refinancing. And the banks don’t expect the refinancing boom to continue once interest rates start to rise, which could be as early as next year.

Mortgage originations jumped 56 percent at Wells Fargo and 29 percent at JPMorgan compared with a year ago. At Citi, they fell 15 percent.

Mortgages, and the securities they were bundled into, were a scourge during the financial crisis, felling storied financial institutions that made loans that were too risky or bet that securities made of subprime mortgages would keep rising.

The banks’ mortgage units are still a magnet for lawsuits and regulatory charges. In August, Citigroup agreed to settle lawsuits from shareholders who said the bank didn’t properly warn them of its exposure to risky subprime debt.

Citigroup also reported Monday that it had to set aside more money in case it has to buy back more mortgages from investors who bought them in the run-up to the financial crisis, and now feel ripped off. Gerspach said the bank was seeing “increased activity” in so-called repurchase demands from Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored mortgage giant.

Overall, the bank trimmed about 2 percent of its jobs, dropping to 262,000 employees from 267,000. It spent less on advertising and marketing, but more on technology and communication.

Citigroup is still trying to patch its reputation after the financial crisis nearly brought it to collapse. After years of empire-building, the bank has been selling units and trying to become more efficient and more manageable.

CEO Vikram Pandit is still an ardent defender of the big-bank model, even though the former CEO, Sandy Weill, went on CNBC in July and said big banks should be broken up. It was a surprising change of heart for the dealmaker who built Citi into a behemoth.

Citi also has to figure out how to pay top executives without alienating its shareholders. Citi paid Pandit nearly $15 million for 2011, about half in option awards, but shareholders in the spring said they disagreed with the payout.

Gerspach declined to comment on how the bank might change executive pay next year, saying that was the board’s purview.

Excluding one-time items, net income was $3.3 billion. That amounted to $1.06 per share, beating the 96 cents predicted by analysts polled by financial data provider FactSet. Analyst predictions generally exclude one-time charges and gains.

Revenue, excluding the special charges, was $19.4 billion. That beat expectations of $18 billion.

The bank wrote down $4.7 billion after agreeing to sell its portion of retail brokerage Morgan Stanley Smith Barney for less than it had hoped. Including that and other one-time charges, net income was $455 million, and revenue was $14 billion.

Without the special charges, net income and revenue were both up. With them, net income and revenue were down significantly.