Opinions – 2/14/13: 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

Civil Procedure  Intervention  BOTTOM LINE: District court properly denied putative intervenors’ motion to intervene as defendants in plaintiffs’ lawsuit challenging constitutionality of state abortion informed consent statute, because Attorney General, who actively sought to defend statute, shared same objective as putative intervenors and putative intervenors did not make strong showing of inadequacy of representation. CASE: Stuart v. Huff, ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *