Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Child support agency makes progress on reforms

Within the past few months, the Department of Human Resources has made significant progress in resolving the issues raised by the Office of Legislative Audits concerning its Child Support Enforcement Administration.

The department has corrected seven of the 11 mistakes discovered by auditors during their evaluation of the child support system, and it is expected to remedy the final four problems by the end of April, according to the Office of Legislative Audits. The office released a 2011 report revealing that state authorities were not using all of the enforcement tools at their disposal to get parents to pay child support.

Now, however, the department has become more aggressive about collecting child support, and it has increased child support collections to a record high.

But until the corrections are certified by auditors, the department will not receive $100,000 of its 2013 appropriation.

At a Senate Health and Human Resources Subcommittee meeting Friday, Human Resources Secretary Ted Dallas asked senators to stop withholding funds in recognition of his good faith effort to respond to auditors’ concerns, but committee members insisted that Dallas had to resolve all the audit findings before they would release funds to his department.

“I know you have your work cut out for you, and you’ve done a great job,” said Sen. James Robey, D-Howard, the subcommittee chair. Robey has repeatedly commended Dallas for taking the reins of a troubled agency, since the Department of Human Resources has a checkered history with auditors, and Dallas became department secretary after the audits occurred.

Robey emphasized that he understood there were many obstacles to reform, but he asked Dallas to push harder for change.

“What we’d like to see you do is go to your people and take these folks by the collar, and say that they’ve got to fix things,” Robey said.

Overhauling the system

When Dallas took office in May 2011, the Child Support Enforcement Administration was riddled with problems, and these issues were documented in a September 2011 audit.

During the three-year period between September 2007 and October 2010, the audit found child support collectors made some major mistakes, including a lack of seizures from the bank accounts of parents refusing to pay child support and the insufficient withholding of wages. Auditors also discovered inaccurate identification of non-custodial parents and the improper delivery of checks made out to dead custodial parents, which were occasionally fraudulently cashed.

It also became apparent that Baltimore contractors were not complying with the terms of their state contract to collect child support and that they had failed to follow proper procedures in the majority of their collection cases.

Once Dallas became aware of these problems, he vowed to overhaul the child support system and enacted several initiatives for reform. Those included renegotiating contracts with collection agencies — which are now required to meet performance standards before they receive state funds — a policy change that was approved by the Board of Public Works two weeks ago.

Dallas also created a database of dead custodial parents in order to prevent fraud, and he established a new program intended to help non-custodial parents find work when they are unemployed and unable to pay child support.

Dallas’ approach has yielded financial dividends. His department collected $544 million in child support last year, a $25 million increase over the previous year and a state record for child support collections.

Nevertheless, Dallas has his critics. Sen. Nathaniel McFadden, D-Baltimore, said the secretary has relied too heavily on private contractors, especially in Baltimore.

“Just so you know, I’m still not happy,” McFadden said. “I think if you give the resources to state employees, they’ll do a better job. Private contractors do many things well, but in this case, the profit motive is a corrupting influence.”

In an emailed statement on March 5, Dallas wrote that he had finished addressing the 2011 audit findings and respectfully disagreed with those who say there is more work required to address them.

“The Department takes the findings of the legislative audit very seriously,” Dallas wrote. “We agreed with several of the recommendations and promptly took action to address them, and we believe that we now have successfully resolved all eleven audit findings.”

One comment

  1. Notice the mythical “Best Interest of the Child” is nowhere to be found in this piece?
    What all people – all tax payers – need to understand is that the mythical “Best Interest of the Child” has nothing at all to do with the motivation behind this audit, or the departmental child support collection tactics or methodology. The States’ – all 50 – fervent interest in maintaining their massive annual Federal Subsidies for their child support collection and case management efforts -directly connected to their child support collection data – is what drives the Gestapo like collection tactics they employ in matters involving child support. The fact that Maryland’s child support collection numbers are low, can – and eventually most certainly will – trigger reductions to these massive federal subsidies. In essence, child support collection workers – private or otherwise – could lose their jobs based upon potential federal subsidy reductions linked to low – or reduced – child support collection data. To understand what a tremendous taxpayer rip-off this is, one needs to know that the only definitive Federally Funded study ever conducted on the subject of child support showed that when employed, men pay between 83 and 91% of ALL court ordered child support, and that they do so without intervention of any kind. But, when those figures became apparent Wayne Stanton, then head of the National Child Support Enforcement Department in D.C had the study discontinued! Further, Stanton’s office demanded a formal Freedom of Information Act Submission merely to retrieve the study’s data. Not to be overlooked, in U.S. divorce and custody cases, mothers are awarded primary physical custody of minor children – when such children are involved – 91% of the time!
    In California alone, we have over 8,000 men paying child support for children that DNA evidence has proven they didn’t father; whay? Quota! If the Golden State were to emancipate these men from their assigned debt, the State risks losing the $90+ million Federal Dollars it receives ANNUALLY for its child support collection and case management efforts. Not incidentally, these federal funds NEVER make their way into the lives of children of divorce or impoverished kids, instead financing the salaries, benefits packages, paid vacation time, and pensions of tens-of-thousands of people employed by – or retired from – the Child Support Collection and Family Law regimes, people just like your very own, Ted Dallas.