Quantcast

Law digest: 8/8/13

MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS  Evidence, Frye/Reed analysis: Where the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert did not involve a “novel scientific method,” a Frye/Reed analysis was not required, as a prerequisite to the application of Rule 5-702, in order to determine the admissibility of the expert’s testimony. Dixon v. Ford Motor Company, No. 82, Sept. Term, 2012. RecordFax ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*