Opinions – 3/27/14: Maryland Court of Special Appeals

Administrative Law Client protection fund  BOTTOM LINE: A lender who advanced funds to an attorney in exchange for an interest in expected fees was not entitled to recover its losses from the Client Protection Fund when the attorney defalcated, because there was no attorney-client relationship between the lender and the attorney. CASE: American Asset Finance, LLC v. Trustees ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *