Quantcast

STATE OF MARYLAND v. CHUCKIE DONALDSON

The State argues that appellee, who was on parole at the time of the search, had a diminished expectation of privacy. Appellee asserts that, because the officer was unaware that appellee was on parole, appellee’s status did not justify the warrantless search.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*