Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Indecent exposure
Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Mario Malik White, appellant, was convicted of two counts of indecent exposure and one count each of disorderly conduct and disturbing the peace.
Appellant asks essentially two questions on appeal: I. Did the trial court err under Md. Rule 4-246 and federal/state constitutional law when it proceeded to a bench trial even though appellant had never waived his right to a jury trial? II. Was the evidence legally sufficient to sustain his two convictions for indecent exposure when appellant allegedly engaged in only a single course of exposure?