Md. high court sets burden in whistleblower defamation claims at ‘preponderance of evidence’

Judges reject call for more burdensome 'clear and convincing' standard

Private individuals alleging to have been defamed in an internal state investigation must prove their claim by a preponderance of the evidence, a divided Maryland high court has ruled.

To purchase a reprint of this article, contact reprints@thedailyrecord.com.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *