Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

JAMES EDWARD MAXWELL, III v. STATE OF MARYLAND

Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Photo identification

Convicted of robbery, after the entry of a conditional guilty plea, in the Circuit Court for Cecil County, James Edward Maxwell, III, appellant, raises a single issue on appeal: whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress what he claims was an impermissibly suggestive pre-trial photographic identification of him by the victim of the robbery.

Read the opinion here:

1 of 1 article

0 articles remaining

Grow your business intelligence with The Daily Record. Register now for more article access.