Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

JASON ADAM FALLIN v. STATE OF MARYLAND

Criminal procedure — Rebuttal argument by state — Arguing facts not in evidence

Appellant, Jason Fallin, was charged in the Circuit Court for Charles County with one count of continuing course of conduct against a child, two counts each of third degree sex offense, fourth degree sex offense, sexual abuse of a minor, and second degree assault. Following a trial on April 18-22, 2016, a jury convicted him of one count each of third degree sex offense, sexual abuse of a minor, and second degree assault. Appellant was sentenced to 25 years imprisonment, with all but 21 years suspended for sexual abuse of a minor and 10 years concurrent for third degree sex offense, with 5 years supervised probation. Appellant timely appealed and presents the following questions for our review:

1. Did the trial court err by allowing a witness who was not a social worker to repeat what the child complainant had told her under the tender years exception to the hearsay rule?

2. Did the trial court err by allowing a witness to opine, as an expert, on whether another witness showed signs of fabrication or coaching?

3. Did the trial court err by refusing to give a requested instruction that would have informed jurors that the credibility of another witness is not a proper subject of expert testimony?

4. Did the prosecutor argue facts not in evidence on a key issue in rebuttal closing argument?

5. Did the trial court err by admitting irrelevant evidence of Mr. Fallin’s failure to report himself to Child Protective Services?

Read the opinion here: