Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Baltimore jury awards $75K to man sprayed with tear gas by police during Freddie Gray unrest

In this still taken from a bystander’s video recording, Larry Lomax, center on ground, is grabbed by a police officer after being pepper-sprayed in May 2015. Lomax’s lawyers argued the video itself is enough to prove excessive force, but a Baltimore judge on Wednesday allowed the case to proceed to trial next month.

In this still taken from a bystander’s video recording, Larry Lomax, center on ground, is grabbed by a police officer after being pepper-sprayed in May 2015. A Baltimore jury Wednesday awarded Lomax $75,000 for the incident, finding police used excessive force.

A Baltimore jury awarded $75,000 on Wednesday to a man who was sprayed with tear gas at close range and tackled by police during the 2015 civil unrest following the death of Freddie Gray.

Larry Lomax filed an excessive force lawsuit in Baltimore City Circuit Court in 2016. Video of the incident, taken by a bystander and uploaded online, showed him approaching police after they ordered a crowd to comply with the curfew, yelling and demanding to be arrested.

Lt. Christopher O’Ree, who was commanding a mobile field force, sprayed Lomax with a canister of either pepper spray or tear gas — the parties disputed the substance — after which Sgt. Keith Gladstone took him to the ground and two officers removed him from the intersection when the crowd began throwing bottles.

Jason Downs, one of Lomax’s lawyers, said testimony at trial showed O’Ree used a form of tear gas meant for crowd dispersal which department policy requires officers to warn the public about before use.

“They claimed that they didn’t have time to warn him to stop, though they saw him approaching from 100 feet away,” said Downs, of Downs Collins P.A. in Baltimore.

The jury returned the verdict at the conclusion of a five-day trial and one day of deliberations in Baltimore City Circuit Court.

At a motions hearing last month, defense attorney Neal E. Duke argued the officers were facing a man who approached them threateningly in a rapidly evolving situation during days of sometimes violent civil unrest. Duke described Lomax as “not backing down” and said O’Ree and Gladstone said in depositions he approached “aggressively.”

But Lomax’s attorneys contended the video showed Lomax being sprayed in the face and pulled to the ground by his hair after he was incapacitated.

Lomax was poised on the stand, according to Downs, and told jurors he was participating in civil disobedience by breaking the curfew but was not involved in any of the more violent unrest.

“He was clear in his testimony that while he expected that he may have been arrested, he didn’t expect excessive force,” Downs said.

Lomax is one of six plaintiffs who filed a lawsuit against police for actions taken during the unrest. The cases were severed at defense request, and Lomax was the first to go to trial.

City Solicitor Andre M. Davis praised Judge Videtta Brown’s handling of the litigation but declined to comment Thursday on Lomax’s case until the remaining cases are concluded. The Baltimore Law Department will consult with Duke on any possible basis for appealing Wednesday’s verdict.

Got a verdict or settlement you’d like to share? Tell us about it.

Larry Lomax et al. v. Lieutenant Christopher O’Ree et al.

Court: Baltimore City Circuit Court

Case No.: 24C16002313

Judge: Videtta A. Brown

Proceeding: Jury trial

Outcome: Verdict for plaintiff ($75,000)


Incident: May 2, 2015

Suit filed: April 19, 2016

Verdict: Jan. 24, 2018

Plaintiff’s Attorneys: Jason Downs and Tiffani S. Collins of Downs Collins P.A., William H. Murphy III of Murphy, Falcon & Murphy in Baltimore, and Wylie Stecklow of Stecklow & Thompson in New York.

Defendants’ Attorney: Neal Duke, shareholder with Baker Donelson PC in Baltimore

Count: Excessive force

To purchase a reprint of this article, contact [email protected].