Criminal procedure — Motion to strike due to evidence fabrication — Due diligence
A jury, in the Circuit Court for Cecil County, convicted Henry Hamilton, appellant, of conspiracy to commit first-degree assault. Hamilton was sentenced to a term of twenty-five years’ imprisonment. After noting an appeal, Hamilton filed a pro se “Motion to Strike Judgment Due to Evidence Fabrication.” Following a hearing, the court denied Hamilton’s motion.
In this appeal, Hamilton asks whether the court erred in denying his motion.