Criminal procedure — Right to speedy trial — Length of delay
A jury, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, convicted Charles Henson, appellant, of second-degree murder and use of a firearm in a crime of violence. Henson was sentenced to a total term of 45 years’ imprisonment.
In this appeal, Henson presents the following questions for our review: 1. Did the circuit court err in denying Mr. Henson’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of a speedy trial? 2. Did the circuit court err in admitting either the prior testimony of a witness or a recorded telephone conversation involving that witness, where Mr. Henson had no prior opportunity or motive to cross-examine the witness concerning that telephone conversation?
1 of 1 article
0 articles remaining
Grow your business intelligence with The Daily Record. Register now for more article access.