Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

ANTIONE MAYO v. STATE OF MARYLAND

Criminal procedure — Motion to include evidence — Body-camera footage

In 2017, a Baltimore City jury convicted appellant Antione Mayo (“Mayo”) of possessing and intending to distribute heroin. 1 Mayo argues that the trial court improperly excluded police body camera footage that: (1) showed the police obtaining the identifying information of a female missing witness; (2) contained statements by police to the woman identifying her as a potential witness; and (3) contained statements by the woman exculpating Mayo.

Read the opinion