Unreported Opinions//May 23, 2023
//May 23, 2023
Administrative law — Arbitrary and capricious — Cost recovery
This case is before us on appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City affirming a decision of the Maryland Public Service Commission (“PSC” or “Commission”). We are asked to determine whether the Commission acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it approved an August 28, 2020 “Application for Authority to Increase its Existing Rates and Charges and to Revise Its Terms and Conditions for Gas Services” (the “Application”) filed by Washington Gas Light Company (“Washington Gas”).
Sign up for your daily digest of Maryland News.
Erie Insurance sues Maryland Insurance Administration over finding of race discr[...]
9/6/2023
Moore appoints members to authority for sustaining thoroughbred horse racing
9/6/2023
Md. Bar Foundation presents awards, announces class of fellows
9/6/2023
Md. Board of Elections names successor to longtime administrator Lamone
8/6/2023
At MSBA, one panel asks whether non-lawyers can help improve access to justice
8/6/2023
Donald Trump described Pentagon plan of attack and shared classified map, indict[...]
9/6/2023
Trump indicted: What to know about the documents case and what’s next
9/6/2023
Lawyers blame ChatGPT for tricking them into citing bogus case law
9/6/2023
Supreme Court voting rights ruling stuns minority voters, who hope it expands th[...]
9/6/2023
Trump indicted in classified documents case in a historic first for a former pre[...]
8/6/2023
Submit an entry for the business calendar