Custody: Modification: Children’s preference
CSA No. 1974, Sept. Term 2012. Unreported.
Opinion by Moylan, Charles E., Jr., retired, spec. assigned.
Filed March 21, 2014.
Appeal from Baltimore City. Affirmed.
RecordFax # 14-0321-00, 4 pages.
Aside from her failure to preserve the question for appellate review, mother’s contention that the court should have interviewed the children before modifying custody lacked merit because the proceeding in question was not an evidentiary hearing; even if it were, an interview with the children is not a mandatory requirement, and the mother never requested the court to conduct such an interview.