Divorce: Alimony: Unconscionable disparity
CSA No. 2096, Sept. Term 2013. Reported.
Opinion by Nazarian, J. Filed Oct. 30, 2014.
Appeal from Anne Arundel County. Affirmed.
RecordFax 14-1030-01, 30 pages.
The trial court did not err in finding that payments to husband from his employer were not loans but, in fact, a bonus or retention incentive plan; however, the award of indefinite alimony was based not solely on that money but also on such factors as wife’s contributions to the family, the circumstances contributing to the estrangement, wife’s potential earnings and the resulting unconscionable disparity in the parties’ standards of living.