Nondisparagement orders in divorce cases improperly restrained speech

BOSTON -- Despite a compelling interest in protecting a child from exposure to his divorcing parents’ disparaging words, a judge violated the First Amendment with an order that was an impermissible prior restraint on freedom of speech, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has decided. The SJC noted that prior restraints are one of the law’s “most ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *