Divorce: Settlement Agreement: Motion to revise decree CSA No. 2523, Sept. Term 2012. Unreported. Opinion by Sharer, J.F., J. (Retired, Specially Assigned). Filed: April 9, 2014. Appeal from Baltimore County. Affirmed.

Divorce: Marital property: Fraud and deceit. CSA No. 2035, Sept. Term 2011. Opinion by Sharer, J. F., J., retired, specially assigned. Filed: April 4, 2014. Appeal from Queen Anne’s County. Affirmed.

Divorce: Cohabitation: Sexual relations by phone. Court of Special Appeals No. 0405, Sept. Term 2012. Reported. Opinion by Meredith, J. Filed April 30, 2014. Appeal from Montgomery County. Reversed.

Now we know: It IS possible to be too zealous.

"Why is it that there is all this ceremony to getting married, and no ceremony at all when you get unmarried? Shouldn't you have to look the person in the eye and apologize to them when all is said and done?" That’s the question that spurred HuffPost blogger Lara Lillibridge to imagine what such a divorce ritual would look like.

For those in the armed forces, divorce can be a whole new battleground.

Senate Bill 790 was aimed at protecting the privacy of abused spouses and young adults still covered under their parents’ insurance. Less evident is that it could also affect Maryland residents going through a divorce.

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit by a divorced woman who claimed that her religious employer fired her for “failing to reconcile her marriage” but took no such action against similarly situated male employees.

Divorce: Motion to revise decree: Fraud, mistake or irregularity CSA No. 1923, Sept. Term 2012. Unreported. Opinion by Hotten, J. Filed March 25, 2014. Appeal from Baltimore City. Affirmed.

Divorce: Separation and Property Agreement: Appointment of trustee for sale CSA No. 0979, Sept. Term 2012. Unreported. Opinion by Nazarian, J. Filed March 24, 2014. Appeal from Anne Arundel County. Affirmed.