{"id":2465,"date":"2012-11-15T16:41:47","date_gmt":"2012-11-15T20:41:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/?p=2465"},"modified":"2014-05-15T16:45:43","modified_gmt":"2014-05-15T20:45:43","slug":"kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/","title":{"rendered":"Kimberly Hamby v. Reuben I. Hamby"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Domestic violence protective order: Appeal: Mooted by expiration of order<\/p>\n<p>CSA No. 2868, Sept. Term 2011. Unreported. Opinion by Eyler, James R., J. Filed Sept. 20, 2012. RecordFax #12-0920-07, 4 pp.<\/p>\n<p>The expiration of a domestic violence protective order renders the appeal moot, and the possibility that the expired order could prejudice appellant in future litigation is not a matter of public interest.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/files\/2014\/05\/2868s11-Hamby-v.-Hamby.pdf\" href=\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/files\/2014\/05\/2868s11-Hamby-v.-Hamby.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Read the opinion<\/p>\n<p><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Domestic violence protective order: Appeal: Mooted by expiration of order<\/p>\n<p>CSA No. 2868, Sept. Term 2011. Unreported. Opinion by Eyler, James R., J. Filed Sept. 20, 2012. RecordFax #12-0920-07, 4 pp.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[393,1435,4964],"tags":[703,93448,71523,18796,71527],"class_list":["post-2465","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-domestic-violence","category-opinions","category-torts","tag-anne-arundel-county","tag-expiration-of-order","tag-eyler","tag-moot","tag-sept-term-2011","never_free"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Kimberly Hamby v. Reuben I. Hamby - Maryland Family Law<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kimberly Hamby v. Reuben I. Hamby - Maryland Family Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Domestic violence protective order: Appeal: Mooted by expiration of order  CSA No. 2868, Sept. Term 2011. Unreported. Opinion by Eyler, James R., J. Filed Sept. 20, 2012. RecordFax #12-0920-07, 4 pp.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Maryland Family Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-11-15T20:41:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-15T20:45:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Daily Record Staff\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Daily Record Staff\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/\",\"name\":\"Kimberly Hamby v. Reuben I. Hamby - Maryland Family Law\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-11-15T20:41:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-15T20:45:43+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/f183f73d88f1251a1a16a9ad6595afbb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kimberly Hamby v. Reuben I. Hamby\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/\",\"name\":\"Maryland Family Law\",\"description\":\"Maryland family law opinions and commentary\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/f183f73d88f1251a1a16a9ad6595afbb\",\"name\":\"Daily Record Staff\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9a756a099e254ac506dfc6deee3f7a2bd3d649e6fd772f18ac6972e5174f56e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9a756a099e254ac506dfc6deee3f7a2bd3d649e6fd772f18ac6972e5174f56e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Daily Record Staff\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/author\/dailyrecordstaff\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kimberly Hamby v. Reuben I. Hamby - Maryland Family Law","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kimberly Hamby v. Reuben I. Hamby - Maryland Family Law","og_description":"Domestic violence protective order: Appeal: Mooted by expiration of order  CSA No. 2868, Sept. Term 2011. Unreported. Opinion by Eyler, James R., J. Filed Sept. 20, 2012. RecordFax #12-0920-07, 4 pp.","og_url":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/","og_site_name":"Maryland Family Law","article_published_time":"2012-11-15T20:41:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-15T20:45:43+00:00","author":"Daily Record Staff","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Daily Record Staff"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/","url":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/","name":"Kimberly Hamby v. Reuben I. Hamby - Maryland Family Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-11-15T20:41:47+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-15T20:45:43+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/f183f73d88f1251a1a16a9ad6595afbb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2012\/11\/15\/kimberly-hamby-v-reuben-i-hamby\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kimberly Hamby v. Reuben I. Hamby"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/","name":"Maryland Family Law","description":"Maryland family law opinions and commentary","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/f183f73d88f1251a1a16a9ad6595afbb","name":"Daily Record Staff","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9a756a099e254ac506dfc6deee3f7a2bd3d649e6fd772f18ac6972e5174f56e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9a756a099e254ac506dfc6deee3f7a2bd3d649e6fd772f18ac6972e5174f56e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Daily Record Staff"},"url":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/author\/dailyrecordstaff\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/39"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2465"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2465\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2465"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2465"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}