{"id":8771,"date":"2017-09-08T10:32:24","date_gmt":"2017-09-08T14:32:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/?p=8771"},"modified":"2017-09-08T10:32:24","modified_gmt":"2017-09-08T14:32:24","slug":"in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/","title":{"rendered":"IN RE: ADOPTION\/GUARDIANSHIP OF M.K., I.K. AND N.K."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>CINA &#8212; Termination of parental rights &#8212; Motion for a new trial<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>This appeal arises out of juvenile court proceedings that terminated the parental rights of M.K., I.K., and N.K.\u2019s biological mother. Mother argues that the juvenile court erred in two respects. First, she asserts that it abused its discretion by denying her motion for a new trial after Baltimore City deputy sheriffs allegedly denied her entry into the courthouse during trial. Second, she asserts that the juvenile court erred by erroneously admitting three exhibits that contained inadmissible hearsay. All parties agree that the exhibits were erroneously admitted.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.courts.state.md.us\/appellate\/unreportedopinions\/2017\/1679s16.pdf\">Read the opinion here:<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CINA &#8212; Termination of parental rights &#8212; Motion for a new trial This appeal arises out of juvenile court proceedings that terminated the parental rights of M.K., I.K., and N.K.\u2019s biological mother. Mother argues that the juvenile court erred in two respects. First, she asserts that it abused its discretion by denying her motion for &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":39,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[71482,1197,1435,4964],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8771","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-adoption-guardianship","category-children","category-opinions","category-torts","never_free"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v24.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>IN RE: ADOPTION\/GUARDIANSHIP OF M.K., I.K. AND N.K. - Maryland Family Law<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"IN RE: ADOPTION\/GUARDIANSHIP OF M.K., I.K. AND N.K. - Maryland Family Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"CINA &#8212; Termination of parental rights &#8212; Motion for a new trial This appeal arises out of juvenile court proceedings that terminated the parental rights of M.K., I.K., and N.K.\u2019s biological mother. Mother argues that the juvenile court erred in two respects. First, she asserts that it abused its discretion by denying her motion for ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Maryland Family Law\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-08T14:32:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Daily Record Staff\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Daily Record Staff\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/\",\"name\":\"IN RE: ADOPTION\/GUARDIANSHIP OF M.K., I.K. AND N.K. - Maryland Family Law\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-08T14:32:24+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-08T14:32:24+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/f183f73d88f1251a1a16a9ad6595afbb\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"IN RE: ADOPTION\/GUARDIANSHIP OF M.K., I.K. AND N.K.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/\",\"name\":\"Maryland Family Law\",\"description\":\"Maryland family law opinions and commentary\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/f183f73d88f1251a1a16a9ad6595afbb\",\"name\":\"Daily Record Staff\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9a756a099e254ac506dfc6deee3f7a2bd3d649e6fd772f18ac6972e5174f56e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9a756a099e254ac506dfc6deee3f7a2bd3d649e6fd772f18ac6972e5174f56e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Daily Record Staff\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/author\/dailyrecordstaff\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"IN RE: ADOPTION\/GUARDIANSHIP OF M.K., I.K. AND N.K. - Maryland Family Law","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"IN RE: ADOPTION\/GUARDIANSHIP OF M.K., I.K. AND N.K. - Maryland Family Law","og_description":"CINA &#8212; Termination of parental rights &#8212; Motion for a new trial This appeal arises out of juvenile court proceedings that terminated the parental rights of M.K., I.K., and N.K.\u2019s biological mother. Mother argues that the juvenile court erred in two respects. First, she asserts that it abused its discretion by denying her motion for ...","og_url":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/","og_site_name":"Maryland Family Law","article_published_time":"2017-09-08T14:32:24+00:00","author":"Daily Record Staff","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Daily Record Staff","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/","url":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/","name":"IN RE: ADOPTION\/GUARDIANSHIP OF M.K., I.K. AND N.K. - Maryland Family Law","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-09-08T14:32:24+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-08T14:32:24+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/f183f73d88f1251a1a16a9ad6595afbb"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/2017\/09\/08\/in-re-adoptionguardianship-of-m-k-i-k-and-n-k\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"IN RE: ADOPTION\/GUARDIANSHIP OF M.K., I.K. AND N.K."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/","name":"Maryland Family Law","description":"Maryland family law opinions and commentary","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/f183f73d88f1251a1a16a9ad6595afbb","name":"Daily Record Staff","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9a756a099e254ac506dfc6deee3f7a2bd3d649e6fd772f18ac6972e5174f56e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9a756a099e254ac506dfc6deee3f7a2bd3d649e6fd772f18ac6972e5174f56e3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Daily Record Staff"},"url":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/author\/dailyrecordstaff\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8771","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/39"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8771"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8771\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8771"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8771"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedailyrecord.com\/maryland-family-law\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8771"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}