Quantcast

Tag Archives: Hotten

PHILLIP HERRELL v. STATE of MARYLAND

Appealing his first-degree murder conviction, appellant asks: I. Whether the trial court erred or abused its discretion in admitting evidence regarding the extent of appellant’s gang involvement. II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by limiting the defense’s cross-examination of a prosecution witness.

Read More »

VICKY AND LARRY OREM v. HANOVER OFFICE PARK COUNCIL OF UNIT OWNERS

Condominium owners brought a declaratory action against the condominium association, seeking a declaration that they had the right to lock the front stairwell door that led to their unit. Did the circuit court err in finding that the Condominium Documents create an easement for ingress and egress through the Limited Common Element?

Read More »

Idowu Dada Akinbolusere v. State of Maryland

I. Did the trial court err in refusing to either grant a continuance so that an elderly infirm alibi witness could appear or permit the witness to appear remotely via two-way video conferencing? II. Did the trial court err in permitting the State to elicit an in-court identification of both appellants on re-direct examination when in-court identification was not raised on direct examination and was outside the scope of cross examination? III. Was the evidence sufficient to convict [a]ppellant Idowu of counts 1, 5 and 9 and [a]ppellant Mary of Count 9?

Read More »

Bolajoko Mary Akinbolusere v. State of Maryland

I. Did the trial court err in refusing to either grant a continuance so that an elderly infirm alibi witness could appear or permit the witness to appear remotely via two-way video conferencing? II. Did the trial court err in permitting the State to elicit an in-court identification of both appellants on re-direct examination when in-court identification was not raised on direct examination and was outside the scope of cross examination? III. Was the evidence sufficient to convict [a]ppellant Idowu of counts 1, 5 and 9 and [a]ppellant Mary of Count 9?

Read More »

University of Maryland Medical System Corporation v. Roshell Blue

I. Whether the trial court erred in admitting a medical bill as substantive evidence. II. Whether the trial court erred in granting appellee’s motion to substitute her witness. III. Whether the trial court erred in allowing Kenneth Lippman, M.D. to offer expert testimony as to permanency. IV. Whether appellee’s missing witness argument at closing was unduly prejudicial.

Read More »