On July 9, 2013, six out of seven judges sitting on the highest court in the state of Maryland, the Court of Appeals, deciding the case of James Coleman v. Soccer Association of Columbia, filed an opinion in which they collectively and minimally “conceded” that “a system premised on comparative negligence for apportioning fault appears to be a more equitable system of determining liability and a more socially desirable method of loss distribution.”
Tagged with: breaking news Legal Commentary legal commentary maryland News steven i. platt
Read More »