Sign In
Free Newsletter
MICHAEL TEVIS HERR, JR. v. STATE OF MARYLAND
The testimony at issue was a single response to a question asked during crossexamination. The court’s offer of a curative instruction was declined by defense counsel.
GARY STOKES v. STATE OF MARYLAND
By twice indicating his acceptance and satisfaction with the jury as empaneled, without qualification, appellant waived appellate review of his claim that the State exercised its peremptory challenges in violation of Batson; however, his convictions should have merged for sentencing purposes.
WINIFRED J. BOOKER v. JAMES LAWRENCE KERNAN HOSPITAL, INC. et al.
Appellant alleged breach of contract, breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, negligence, and other misconduct by Kernan Hospital, Inc., and others. Kernan successfully raised the defense of immunity under state and federal law.
LENNY LUCAS v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Convicted of theft above $1000, appellant challenges sufficiency of the evidence that the value of the vehicle in question was worth that amount.
JUSTIN D. FRELAND v. STATE of MARYLAND
Convicted of second-degree assault, appellant challenges the trial court’s ruling that limited certain cross-examination of a prosecution witness.
ANTONIO CHARLES JOHNSON v. STATE OF MARYLAND
Convicted of first-degree assault, appellant presents one issue: Whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting and playing for the jury recordings of police interviews that included inadmissible and highly prejudicial material.
El Soundani El Wahhabi v. State of Maryland
In this appeal, we consider appellant’s challenge to the trial court’s refusal to order a new competency evaluation before the second trial, and within 20 days of a prior evaluation.
Walter Jerome Ford v. State of Maryland
“Whether the trial court erred in admitting hearsay testimony.”
Michael Redding, III v. State of Maryland
Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the circuit court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his home pursuant to a search warrant. He also complains of two evidentiary rulings made by the trial court.
David William Barone v. State of Maryland
In a “Memorandum & Order,” the circuit court denied Barone’s petition as legally insufficient and, consequently, did not hold a hearing. In this timely appeal, Barone challenges the circuit court’s denial of his petition for writ of actual innocence without first holding a hearing.
Tyrone Parks v. State of Maryland
1. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction? 2. In the alternative, did trial counsel’s failure to preserve the sufficiency issue for appellate review amount to ineffective assistance of counsel?
Walead Othman-Hernandez v. State of Maryland
1. Does the docket correctly reflect the sentence the court pronounced? 2. Did the trial court commit plain error in describing the pattern instruction on reasonable doubt as “circular?”
