1. Did the court below err by denying Appellant’s motion to dismiss based on a violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial? 2. Did the court below err by excluding evidence crucial to Appellant’s defense under the Maryland rape shield statute? 3. Is the evidence legally insufficient to sustain Appellant’s convictions?
Tagged with: baltimore city criminal procedure evidence Sept. Term 2013 speedy trial rights sufficiency of the evidence WoodwardRead More »