1. Does appellant’s commitment order correctly reflect the sentence imposed by the trial court? 2. Was the evidence sufficient to support appellant’s conviction for second degree assault? 3. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in declining to ask appellant’s requested voir dire questions?

Tagged with: criminal law criminal procedure Graeff queen annes county second-degree assault Sept. Term 2013 Sufficiency of evidence voir dire

Convicted of theft above $1000, appellant challenges sufficiency of the evidence that the value of the vehicle in question was worth that amount.

Tagged with: baltimore city Sept. Term 2013 Sharer Sufficiency of evidence

I. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain appellant’s convictions for: A) stalking, and B) harassment? II. Did the trial court err when it failed to state on the record that appellant’s waiver of his right to a jury trial was knowing and voluntary as required under Md. Rule 4-246(b)

Tagged with: Alpert Baltimore County criminal procedure harassment Sept. Term 2013 Sufficiency of evidence waiver of jury trial

Appellant asks I. Whether the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on cross-racial identification; and, II. Whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain his conviction for first degree assault.

Tagged with: criminal first-degree assault Sufficiency of evidence