Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Tag Archives: sufficiency of the evidence

TERRILL ANDREA PITTS v. STATE OF MARYLAND

The trial judge found, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Pitts was in the motor vehicle of another with intent to commit theft of the motor vehicle or property in the vehicle. In this appeal, Pitts contends the evidence was insufficient to prove he was in the vehicle with the intent to steal either the vehicle or the contents of that vehicle.

Read More »

IN RE: TARIQ S.

Tariq contends that there was no evidence from which a rational fact-finder could conclude that he committed a breaking and entering, a required element of both third and fourth-degree burglary, and, further, that there was not sufficient evidence to support the court’s finding that he committed theft.

Read More »

BRENDON PATRICK ORR v. STATE OF MARYLAND

I. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain appellant’s convictions for CDS possession and conspiracy to possess CDS with intent to distribute? II. Did the trial court err in admitting other crimes evidence? III. Did the trial court err in admitting into evidence a recording of a jail call?

Read More »

Michael Woods v. State of Maryland

Convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, of two counts of armed robbery and three counts of first-degree assault, as well as use of a handgun in a crime of violence, and possession of a firearm by a disqualified individual, Michael Woods, appellant, contends that the evidence does not support his three assault convictions.

Read More »