1. Did the trial court err by denying [a]ppellant’s objection to the flight instruction? 2. Was the evidence insufficient to prove reckless endangerment?

Tagged with: Davis Prince George's County reckless-endangerment Sept. Term 2012 sufficiency of the evidence

1. Was the evidence sufficient to support appellant’s conviction for possession of a weapon by a person in confinement? 2. Is there ambiguity about which of appellant’s previously imposed sentences serve as the reference for appellant to begin the consecutive sentences imposed in this case?

Tagged with: allegany county Graeff Sept. Term 2012 sufficiency of the evidence

I. Was the evidence legally sufficient to sustain the convictions for second-degree assault and reckless endangerment of Jessica Pettner? II. Did the trial court err by not merging for sentencing the conviction for second-degree assault of Jessica Pettner into the conviction for reckless endangerment of Jessica Pettner?

Tagged with: second-degree assault Sept. Term 2013 sufficiency of the evidence washington county

I. Did the trial court err in refusing to either grant a continuance so that an elderly infirm alibi witness could appear or permit the witness to appear remotely via two-way video conferencing? II. Did the trial court err in permitting the State to elicit an in-court identification of both appellants on re-direct examination when in-court identification was not raised on direct examination and was outside the scope of cross examination? III. Was the evidence sufficient to convict [a]ppellant Idowu of counts 1, 5 and 9 and [a]ppellant Mary of Count 9?

Tagged with: conspiracy Hotten Prince George's County robbery Sept. Term 2013 sufficiency of the evidence

I. Did the trial court err in refusing to either grant a continuance so that an elderly infirm alibi witness could appear or permit the witness to appear remotely via two-way video conferencing? II. Did the trial court err in permitting the State to elicit an in-court identification of both appellants on re-direct examination when in-court identification was not raised on direct examination and was outside the scope of cross examination? III. Was the evidence sufficient to convict [a]ppellant Idowu of counts 1, 5 and 9 and [a]ppellant Mary of Count 9?

Tagged with: conspiracy Hotten Prince George's County robbery Sept. Term 2013 sufficiency of the evidence

1. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction? 2. In the alternative, did trial counsel’s failure to preserve the sufficiency issue for appellate review amount to ineffective assistance of counsel?

Tagged with: Prince George's County second-degree assault Sept. Term 2013 Sharer sufficiency of the evidence

1. Did the court commit reversible error by basing its finding of guilt, in part, on evidence not admitted at trial? 2. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain appellant’s convictions?

Tagged with: criminal law Maryland Court of Special Appeals Sept. Term 2013 sufficiency of the evidence Woodward worcester county

James Enright was convicted for his participation in a robbery. Mr. Enright presents one question: was the evidence sufficient to establish his guilt, as either an aider and abettor or as a conspirator?

Tagged with: Arthur conspiracy criminal law dorchester county robbery Sept. Term 2013 sufficiency of the evidence